0
Article Sign in to save

Marine plastic pollution and extended producer responsibility in the G20

2025

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic mapping of 100 academic and policy sources analyzed how extended producer responsibility (EPR) can reduce marine plastic litter in G20 countries, which are responsible for a significant portion of global plastic production and consumption. The review recommended strengthening legislative frameworks, incentivizing plastic return markets, improving lifecycle management of plastics, and coordinating EPR strategies from global conventions to local implementation in the context of ongoing UNEA Resolution 5/14 treaty negotiations.

Marine plastic pollution is growing exponentially, presenting a major global challenge. G20 countries, responsible for a significant portion of global plastic production and consumption, are uniquely positioned to drive the transition toward more sustainable plastic management. They have an opportunity to strengthen legislative and market frameworks that address plastic across its entire life cycle, from design to disposal. While progress has been made particularly through the ongoing negotiations for the UNEA Resolution 5/14, “End Plastic Pollution: Towards an International Legally Binding Instrument”, much remains to be done to reduce marine plastic pollution. Against this backdrop we reviewed literature and policy documents on extended producer responsibility (EPR) and other measures on its potential to reduce marine plastic litter. Our systematic mapping of 100 academic and policy sources focused on the role of EPR in G20 countries, published between 2017 and 2023, looking for recommendations on how EPR policies could be strengthened and extended to further tackle the issue of marine plastic pollution. Our findings led to several key recommendations for G20 countries and beyond: (1) strengthening legislative frameworks; (2) incentivizing markets to provide economic opportunities for returned plastic products; (3) improvements in the life cycle of plastic, especially in production, consumption and disposal, through integrated waste management systems; and (4) coordination of the EPR strategies on different levels, ranging from globally binding conventions to regional, national and local implementation. In light of global plastic treaty negotiations and ongoing efforts in the G20, we provide a synopsis of current policy and research, based on our scoping review, and recommendations for policymakers to advance EPR and other complementary measures to prevent further growth of plastic pollution.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

T20 Task Force Circular Economy: Circular economy measures to keep plastics and their value in the economy, avoid waste and reduce marine litter: Policy Brief for the G20, The 2030 Agenda Climate & Finance Trade & Investment

AI summary Read the abstract

This T20 policy task force report proposed circular economy measures to reduce plastic pollution entering oceans, including extended producer responsibility, improved collection systems, and design standards for recyclability. It argues that current linear approaches to plastics are economically unsustainable as well as environmentally harmful.

Article

Six Proposals for Future Policies towards Circular Economy and Society

AI summary Read the abstract

This G20 policy brief proposed six priorities for mainstreaming circular economy principles globally, starting with capitalizing on public concern about marine plastic pollution to drive policy momentum. The recommendations also covered extended producer responsibility, circular business models, regional ecological networks, international policy harmonization, and integrating planetary boundaries into circular economy metrics.

Article Tier 2

The global governance of marine plastic pollution: rethinking the extended producer responsibility system

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper analyzes the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system as a governance tool for tackling marine plastic pollution, comparing its implementation across the EU, US, and China. EPR requires plastic producers to take responsibility for the full lifecycle of their products, including waste management. The study identifies challenges in applying EPR internationally but argues it is essential for reducing the plastic waste that breaks down into the microplastics contaminating oceans and seafood.

Article

Accelerating Extended Producer Responsibility implementation in Indonesia to combat plastic pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper examines plastic pollution challenges in Indonesia and proposes extended producer responsibility (EPR) as a key mitigation strategy, drawing lessons from four countries with successful EPR systems. Seven targeted recommendations are offered, including creating a unified EPR coordination agency and implementing public awareness programs to reduce plastic pollution in Indonesia.

Article Tier 2

Global Plastic Pollution and the Transition Towards a Circular Economy: Lessons from the EU’s Legal Framework on Plastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper reviews the EU legal framework on plastics and the transition toward a circular economy, examining how regulatory instruments including the Single-Use Plastics Directive and extended producer responsibility schemes can reduce the billions of tons of plastic waste generated annually.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper