0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

NanoplasticsDrivethe Charge-specific Decline ofAquatic Insect (Chironomus kiinensis) Emergence through Inducing Oxidative Damage and Perturbing theEndocrine System

AI summary Read the abstract

This study exposed the aquatic insect Chironomus kiinensis to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations and measured emergence rates. Positively charged nanoplastics caused greater reduction in emergence (77.8% vs 85.6% emergence rate) due to higher accumulation in tissues and more pronounced oxidative damage and endocrine disruption.

The ongoing decline in the emergence and biomass of aquatic insects is partly due to the wide distribution of engineered nanoparticles. Nanoplastics (NPs), as emerging engineered nanoparticles, can cause toxicity to aquatic organisms. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects of NPs on aquatic insect emergence are not clear. Here, we explored the accumulation of NPs, phenotypic alterations, and physiological and transcriptional responses of Chironomus kiinensis to NPs carrying positive (NP+) and negative (NP−) charges under environmentally relevant concentrations. Results revealed that NP+ induced more reduction of the emergence rate (85.6% for 1 g/kg NP– group and 77.8% for 1 g/kg NP+ group) and the increase of emergence time of C. kiinensis than NP–. This occurred because NP+ were more easily accumulated in larvae than NP– for their stronger electrostatic interactions with negatively charged biomembranes and less agglomeration in exposure media. Compared with NP–, NP+ led to greater oxidative damage through perturbation of the gene expression related to oxidative stress in C. kiinensis. Moreover, the expression of genes associated with emergence was more disrupted in organisms exposed to NP+ than that exposed to NP–, thereby influencing the hormone contents and emergence process of insect. These findings provided new insights into the molecular mechanism that charged NPs affect aquatic insect emergence.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics Drive the Charge-specific Decline of Aquatic Insect (Chironomus kiinensis) Emergence through Inducing Oxidative Damage and Perturbing the Endocrine System

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that nanoplastics with a positive electrical charge were more harmful to aquatic insects than negatively charged ones, reducing emergence rates by over 22% at environmentally relevant concentrations. The positively charged particles were absorbed more easily by larvae due to stronger attraction to cell membranes, causing greater oxidative damage and hormonal disruption.

Article Tier 2

Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed aquatic insect larvae to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the surface charge significantly affected how toxic the particles were. Positively charged nanoplastics caused more severe gut damage, greater accumulation in tissues, and bigger disruptions to gut bacteria. This matters because nanoplastics in the real environment carry various charges, and the findings suggest that charge is an important factor in determining health risks.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics Affect the Bioaccumulation and Gut Toxicity of Emerging Perfluoroalkyl Acid Alternatives to Aquatic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis): Importance of Plastic Surface Charge

AI summary Read the abstract

This study found that nanoplastics changed how a toxic industrial chemical called F-53B accumulated in aquatic insect larvae and made its harmful effects worse. Positively charged nanoplastics were especially dangerous because they carried more of the chemical into the insects' guts, increasing oxidative stress and inflammation. The findings suggest that nanoplastics in the environment can act as carriers that increase the toxicity of other pollutants, potentially amplifying risks throughout the food chain.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics under the charge effects: Unveiling the potential threats to amphibian (Rana nigromaculata) growth, intestinal damage and microbial ecology

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed frog tadpoles to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that both types reduced survival rates, with positively charged particles causing more severe intestinal damage. The positively charged nanoplastics triggered greater oxidative stress in gut tissue and significantly disrupted the diversity of beneficial gut bacteria involved in nutrient absorption. The study suggests that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays an important role in determining how harmful they are to aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed developing zebrafish to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the positively charged particles were significantly more toxic, accumulating in the brain and gut and causing developmental delays and brain cell death. The two types of nanoplastics affected different neurotransmitter pathways and interacted with different brain receptors, explaining their distinct behavioral effects. The study demonstrates that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their toxicity to developing organisms.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper