0
Article Sign in to save

Multi-level governance of Arctic marine plastic pollution: effectiveness and enhancement approaches

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined the multi-level governance framework for Arctic marine plastic pollution across global (UNCLOS, MARPOL), regional (Arctic Council's PAME, AMAP), and national dimensions, finding that effectiveness is constrained by regime robustness and state capacity. The authors argued that effectively tackling marine plastic pollution in the Arctic requires integrating Arctic concerns into global governance agendas, building multidimensional regional frameworks, and enhancing Arctic states' governance capacity while incorporating Indigenous community perspectives.

Marine plastic pollution (MPP) poses a significant threat to the sustainable development of the Arctic. In response, a multi-level governance framework has emerged across global, regional, and national dimensions. At the global level, international agreements such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF) provide foundational regulatory frameworks for marine plastic pollution governance. Regionally, the Arctic Council plays a pivotal role by leveraging initiatives such as the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) and the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). These mechanisms serve to integrate Arctic issues into the global agenda while facilitating knowledge sharing and implementing tailored action plans. Nationally, the eight Arctic states interact with both global and regional governance regimes, participating in collaborative efforts to mitigate marine plastic pollution. However, the effectiveness of multi-level governance of Arctic marine plastic pollution is constrained by regime robustness and state capacity. To more effectively tackle marine plastic pollution in the Arctic, it is imperative to integrate Arctic concerns into global governance agendas, actively build a multidimensional governance framework at the regional level, and enhance the Arctic states’ willingness and capacity—with attention to the contributions and demands of Indigenous communities regarding this issue.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Governance of plastics in the Arctic

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper analyzed governance frameworks for managing plastic pollution in the Arctic, examining how international agreements, national policies, and Indigenous governance systems interact to address the unique challenges of plastic in polar environments. It identified key governance gaps given the Arctic's vulnerability.

Article

A little less conversation: How existing governance can strengthen the future global plastics treaty

AI summary Read the abstract

This analysis examines existing multi-level governance structures for plastics—from global agreements to local regulations—and explores how a new global plastics treaty could complement rather than duplicate these existing frameworks. The authors identify principal roles, shortcomings, and gaps in current governance and propose ways to integrate a new binding instrument with the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm Conventions and other relevant regulatory bodies.

Article

Marine plastic pollution governance: the role and challenges of international law

AI summary Read the abstract

A review of international legal frameworks for marine plastic pollution finds current governance fragmented and inadequate, calling for a lifecycle-based international legal regime to address the full chain of plastic production, use, and disposal. Strengthening international law is essential for systemic microplastic reduction, as ocean connectivity means that plastic—and the microplastics it becomes—cannot be managed effectively by individual nations alone.

Article Tier 2

Legal Approaches to Reduce Plastic Marine Pollution: Challenges and Global Governance

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examined legal approaches to reducing marine plastic pollution and found that while international frameworks like the International Maritime Organization's MARPOL Annex V and regional agreements provide useful foundations, significant governance gaps and enforcement challenges remain in addressing the global scale of marine plastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Dilemma in global governance of marine plastic pollution and regulatory coordination: convention reconstruction via integrated international law

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis examined fragmented international governance of marine plastic pollution across 17 instruments including UNCLOS, MARPOL, and regional conventions, identifying a gap between soft law priorities and binding enforcement for microplastics. The authors proposed an integrated umbrella convention framework with specialized protocols to align the Global Plastic Treaty with existing agreements and establish enforceable plastic production caps.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper