We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Genotoxicity Assessment of Hwanglyeonhaedok-Tang: An Herbal Formula Evaluated Using the In Vivo Alkaline Comet Assay and Pig-a Gene Mutation Assay in Rats
Summary
Researchers tested whether the traditional Asian herbal formula Hwanglyeonhaedok-tang caused DNA damage in rats using in vivo comet and Pig-a gene mutation assays, following earlier positive in vitro genotoxicity results. The in vivo assays did not confirm genotoxicity, suggesting the previous signals may be false positives under realistic dosing conditions.
Abstract Background Hwanglyeonhaedok-tang (HHT), also known as Huang-lian-jie-du-tang or Oren-gedoku-to, is a popular herbal formula in traditional Asian medicine. Despite the clinical effectiveness of herbal formulas, concerns regarding the quality, safety, and efficacy persist. HHT exhibited genotoxicity in bacterial reverse mutation (Ames test) and in vitro chromosomal aberration (CA) test, warranting further investigation. This study aimed to verify HHT-induced genotoxicity through in vivo assays like alkaline comet and phosphatidylinositol glycan class A (Pig-a) gene mutation assay because HHT has shown positive results only in in vitro tests. Methods The in vivo comet assay was conducted on rat liver under Good Laboratory Practice standards to assess DNA migration, focusing on % tail DNA and hedgehog frequency (cells with small or absent heads and diffuse tails). The Pig-a gene mutation assay used peripheral blood to evaluate mutant red blood cells (RBCs) and reticulocytes (RETs), with cytotoxicity assessed by %RET. Doses of 0, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 mg/kg were tested, applying standard statistical methods. Results The comet assay showed no marked increases in % tail DNA or hedgehog frequency at the doses tested. No clinical signs, behavioral abnormalities, or weight changes were noted. Similarly, the Pig-a assay revealed no significant differences in mutant RBCs or RETs, and %RET cytotoxicity was comparable to controls. Positive controls validated assay sensitivity. Overall, HHT did not induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity under tested conditions, supporting its safety at the evaluated dose levels. Conclusions The in vivo comet assay result suggest that the positive outcome observed in the in vitro CA test is likely a false positive. However, although negative result was obtained from short-term Pig-a gene mutation assay, it cannot be conclusively determined that HHT does not induce gene mutations. Therefore, long-term Pig-a studies are recommended.