0
Article Sign in to save

Setting the Legal Basis in International Law for Liability for Transboundary Rivers Plastic Pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

Current international legal frameworks — including the 1992 and 1997 river conventions and global agreements like the Basel and Stockholm Conventions — inadequately address transboundary river plastic pollution, and coherent national and international liability standards are needed. Establishing clear legal accountability for river plastic contamination is critical, as rivers are the dominant pathway by which land-based plastics and microplastics reach the ocean.

Study Type Environmental

This article examines the issue of plastic pollution in rivers, studying various perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of the problem. Data on the volume of plastic pollution are presented, including the sources and consequences of this pollution in rivers. This research demonstrates the magnitude of the problem of river plastic pollution, and the challenges associated with conducting reliable research. Furthermore, the various measures adopted by countries to reduce plastic production, use of disposable plastic products, and the sealing of plastic management processes have been identified. Two types of legal acts are identified at the international level: those that address river management issues, the most important being the 1992 and 1997 Conventions. However, these conventions are not global and their geographical application is limited. Conventions with a global dimension, such as the Basel Convention or the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), partially address the issue of plastics. This article proposes that solving the problem of river plastic pollution requires coherent solutions (at the national and international level) and efficient management of trans- boundary rivers – at the transboundary level and extended to the global level. The development of legal regulations in these areas will likely contribute towards strengthening the basis for bearing responsibility for plastic pollution. Examples of such responsibility are cited in the article, but they refer to national laws.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Freshwater Pollution by Plastics – Transboundary Pollution and Liability

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis examined the environmental and health risks of plastic and microplastic pollution in freshwater systems, reviewing the existing international and national legal frameworks for addressing transboundary pollution. The authors identified significant gaps in liability and enforcement mechanisms for freshwater microplastic contamination.

Article

Combating Plastic Pollution in International Law: Lex Lata and Lex Ferenda

AI summary Read the abstract

A legal analysis of international plastic pollution frameworks finds that no existing global instrument provides mandatory, measurable targets for reducing plastic waste across its full lifecycle. Closing this regulatory gap is critical, as fragmented international law has failed to curb the 22% of plastic waste annually released into environments where it breaks down into microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Analyzing Policies to Address Marine Plastic Pollution: Filling Legal Gaps Through the Engagement of International Actors

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis examines gaps in international law for addressing marine plastic pollution as a transboundary issue, reviewing relevant frameworks from UNCLOS to recent UN resolutions. The paper argues that existing international legal frameworks are insufficient and that stronger multilateral instruments specifically targeting plastic pollution are needed.

Article

Marine plastic pollution governance: the role and challenges of international law

AI summary Read the abstract

A review of international legal frameworks for marine plastic pollution finds current governance fragmented and inadequate, calling for a lifecycle-based international legal regime to address the full chain of plastic production, use, and disposal. Strengthening international law is essential for systemic microplastic reduction, as ocean connectivity means that plastic—and the microplastics it becomes—cannot be managed effectively by individual nations alone.

Article Tier 2

Liability and Compensation for Marine Plastic Pollution: Conceptual Issues and Possible Ways Forward

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper reviews international legal frameworks for holding polluters liable for marine plastic pollution, finding that existing liability mechanisms are largely inadequate. Stronger international legal tools would create financial incentives for companies to reduce plastic waste before it reaches the ocean.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper