0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Transport, Behavior, and Human Exposure of Microplastics in Rural Drinking Water Supply Chains

Environment & Health 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Guanyu Zhou, Guanyu Zhou, Guanyu Zhou, Guanyu Zhou, Guanyu Zhou, Jie Hu, Guanyu Zhou, Guanyu Zhou, Guanyu Zhou, Qidong Wu, Qidong Wu, Guanyu Zhou, Xin Li, Qidong Wu, Qidong Wu, Qidong Wu, Qidong Wu, Qidong Wu, Peng Tang, Guanyu Zhou, Qidong Wu, Peng Tang, Xiaoyu Ren, Xiaoyu Ren, Baicang Liu, Jun Ma Jun Ma Guanyu Zhou, Xiaoyu Ren, Xiaoyu Ren, Xiaoyu Ren, Jingyu Shu, Jingyu Shu, Baicang Liu, Baicang Liu, Jingyu Shu, Jingyu Shu, Jun Ma Jun Ma Peng Tang, Baicang Liu, Baicang Liu, Jun Ma Guanyu Zhou, Baicang Liu, Jie Hu, Baicang Liu, Baicang Liu, Jun Ma Baicang Liu, Baicang Liu, Jun Ma

Summary

Researchers tracked microplastic distribution, transport, and human exposure risk through rural drinking water supply chains in China, finding MPs present throughout the system from source water to tap, with concentration changes at each treatment and distribution stage.

Models
Study Type Environmental

Despite growing concerns about microplastic contamination in urban drinking water, the transport and fate of microplastics within large-scale rural drinking water supply chains remain poorly understood. This study investigated the distribution, migration, and risk of microplastics in source water (lakes, reservoirs, and rivers), drinking water (tap water and well water), and water treatment plant (WTP) across 15 rural regions in Southwest China. Microplastics were ubiquitously detected in all of the samples. Three risk models demonstrated a significantly lower microplastic risk in tap water relative to source water, while well water posed the highest risk. In five regions, microplastic abundance increased and polymer types diversified from the source to tap water, suggesting microplastic release from the water distribution system. Coagulation-sedimentation and ultrafiltration in the WTP removed 65.9% and 100% of the microplastics, respectively. However, backwashing led to the release of the retained microplastics. Correlation, regression, and principal component analyses revealed that the TOC and turbidity were the key factors associated with microplastic abundance. Five metal ions exhibited removal patterns similar to those of microplastics in water treatment. Rural residents may ingest 913 microplastic particles annually by consuming 1 L of tap water every day. This study provides valuable insights into the fate of microplastics in rural drinking water.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper