0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The Sources of EU’s International Influence on Nanotechnology Risk Regulation and Governance

European Journal of Risk Regulation 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ronit Justo‐Hanani Ronit Justo‐Hanani

Summary

This paper examines factors that influence the European Union's ability to shape international nanotechnology risk regulation, finding that EU internal policy coherence, economic leverage, and diplomatic engagement determine its success in promoting its regulatory standards globally.

Abstract The European Union is a world leader in nanotechnology environmental, health and safety (EHS) risk regulation, and since its policy integration has been increasingly active in promoting international coordination and cooperation on nanotechnology risk governance. What affects its ability to influence nanotechnology risk regulation and governance internationally? This analysis focuses on the European Union (EU) level arguing that the EU’s scientific and regulatory capacities have significant explanatory power. Empirically, the article examines three cases of EU influence in key areas of international nanotechnology risk regulation and governance – nanosafety research for regulatory purpose, science diplomacy, and multilateral risk governance, following its integrated policy.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper