0
Article Sign in to save

Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures in Foods: A Comprehensive Methodological and Regulatory Review

Bioresource Technology 2026 1 citation

AI summary Read the abstract

This review synthesizes 15 years of methodological and regulatory progress in cumulative dietary risk assessment for chemical mixtures, finding that dose addition is now the default model for similarly acting contaminants across major food safety institutions. The framework is directly applicable to assessing combined exposure to plastic-associated chemicals such as plasticizers, additives, and microplastic-sorbed contaminants as part of broader dietary xenobiotic cocktails.

Over the last 15 years, mixture risk assessment for food xenobiotics has evolved from conceptual discussions and simple screening tools, such as the Hazard Index (HI), towards operational, component-based and probabilistic frameworks embedded in major food-safety institutions. This review synthesizes methodological and regulatory advances in cumulative risk assessment for dietary "cocktails" of pesticides, contaminants and other xenobiotics, with a specific focus on food-relevant exposure scenarios. At the toxicological level, the field is now anchored in concentration/dose addition as the default model for similarly acting chemicals, supported by extensive experimental evidence that most environmental mixtures behave approximately dose-additively at low effect levels. Building on this paradigm, a portfolio of quantitative metrics has been developed to operationalize component-based mixture assessment: HI as a conservative screening anchor; Relative Potency Factors (RPF) and Toxic Equivalents (TEQ) to express doses within cumulative assessment groups; the Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) to diagnose whether risk is dominated by one or several components; and the combined Margin of Exposure (MOET) as a point-of-departure-based integrator that avoids compounding uncertainty factors. Regulatory frameworks developed by EFSA, the U.S. EPA and FAO/WHO converge on tiered assessment schemes, biologically informed grouping of chemicals and dose addition as the default model for similarly acting substances, while differing in scope, data infrastructure and legal embedding. Implementation in food safety critically depends on robust exposure data streams. Total Diet Studies provide population-level, "as eaten" exposure estimates through harmonized food-list construction, home-style preparation and composite sampling, and are increasingly combined with conventional monitoring. In parallel, human biomonitoring quantifies internal exposure to diet-related xenobiotics such as PFAS, phthalates, bisphenols and mycotoxins, embedding mixture assessment within a dietary-exposome perspective. Across these developments, structured uncertainty analysis and decision-oriented communication have become indispensable. By integrating advances in toxicology, exposure science and regulatory practice, this review outlines a coherent, tiered and uncertainty-aware framework for assessing real-world dietary mixtures of xenobiotics, and identifies priorities for future work, including mechanistically and data-driven grouping strategies, expanded use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and refined mixture-sensitive indicators to support public-health decision-making.

More Papers Like This

Article

Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures in Foods: A Comprehensive Methodological and Regulatory Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This comprehensive review traces 15 years of advances in assessing the health risks of dietary chemical mixtures — including pesticides, PFAS, phthalates, and mycotoxins — outlining how regulatory bodies now apply dose-addition models, probabilistic frameworks, and human biomonitoring to evaluate combined exposures from food more accurately.

Article

Toxicological impacts and human health risk assessment of emerging contaminants in food systems

AI summary Read the abstract

Emerging food contaminants including micro- and nanoplastics, PFAS, and pharmaceutical residues present complex toxicological challenges due to low-dose mixture effects acting across endocrine, immune, metabolic, and neurodevelopmental pathways. Advancing human health risk assessment requires probabilistic dietary exposure modeling, harmonized international frameworks, and mixture toxicology methods that go beyond single-contaminant analysis.

Article

Simultaneous Determination of Bisphenol A and Its Analogues in Food Matrixes: Cumulative Exposure Assessment Following New Regulatory Restrictions—A Systematic Review

AI summary Read the abstract

As bisphenol A faces near-zero regulatory limits in the EU, food exposure assessments show that combined dietary intake of BPA and its structural analogues can push the cumulative Hazard Index above 1, particularly as less-regulated analogues fill its place. This is critical for microplastic research because plastic food packaging is the primary dietary exposure route for bisphenols, and the substitution problem mirrors broader challenges in regulating plastic-derived chemical pollutants.

Article

Invisible Threats in Food Systems: Emerging Contaminants, Exposure Pathways and Safety Concerns

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined the resilience of anaerobic digestion processes to microplastic contamination, assessing whether plastic particles affect methane production and microbial community function. Results indicate that anaerobic digesters can tolerate certain microplastic loads but may experience reduced efficiency at higher concentrations.

Article Tier 2

Convergent endocrine disruption by emerging food-borne contaminants: towards a Pathway Disruption Load (PDL)

AI summary Read the abstract

Everyday chemicals from food packaging, water, and plastics—like PFAS ("forever chemicals"), BPA-related compounds, and microplastics—don't just act alone in our bodies; this review of existing research suggests they team up to disrupt the same hormone and gut-health systems, potentially contributing to thyroid problems, metabolic issues, and reproductive harm. Since regulators currently test these chemicals one at a time, the authors propose a new "Pathway Disruption Load" score that would measure the combined hormonal impact of everyday chemical mixtures, giving a more realistic picture of health risk than test

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper