0
Article Sign in to save

All caught up? Entangled in power, politics, and plastics: the case of abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear in the Baltic Sea

AI summary Read the abstract

Analysis of abandoned, lost, or discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) governance in the Baltic Sea reveals that multi-level power asymmetries, policy gaps, and shared narratives undermine collaborative action to address this major source of marine plastic pollution. Since ALDFG constitutes a significant fraction of ocean plastic that fragments into microplastics, improving its governance framework is critical for reducing downstream microplastic loading.

Abandoned, Lost, or otherwise Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG) contributes to marine plastic pollution, negatively impacting marine habitats and wildlife, and posing risks to human activities (e.g. tourism, maritime transport). To date, research has primarily focused on understanding and classifying types of ALDFG; investigating its impacts on the marine environment; or exploring potential management approaches to address it. Few studies focus on the complex governance of ALDFG, more particularly how power shapes actors’ interactions and collaborations across governance levels (e.g. regional and EU) and sectors (e.g. fisheries and waste management) to mitigate ALDFG. Through case analysis of ALDFG in the Baltic Sea as a Collaborative Governance Regime (CGR), we identify several governance challenges resulting from the interface between power and collaboration. First, multi-level governance causes power asymmetries that hinder capacity for joint action amongst actors at the regional level. Second, policy gaps create power vacuums that limit principled engagement from key actors. Finally, shared discourses lead to powerful regional narratives that weaken shared motivation and capacity for joint action between actors to address common challenges. By synthesizing theories of collaborative governance with power and testing this synthesis in the Baltic Sea region, we address both a gap in the literature on CGRs and identify opportunities that improve governance to mitigate ALDFG.

More Papers Like This

Article

Ghost Gear Governance in the High Seas: A Content Analysis of Current International Governance Institutions

AI summary Read the abstract

This honors thesis conducted a content analysis of nine international governance institutions' documents to evaluate how well they address ghost gear (abandoned, lost, or discarded fishing gear) in the high seas. Findings revealed significant terminology gaps—particularly for ALDFG, plastic, and gear-specific language—and insufficient use of mitigation and remediation principles, highlighting the need for more explicit and coordinated global governance of ghost fishing gear.

Article

A marine pollution governance assessment framework - the case of emerging tyre wear particles governance in the European Union

AI summary Read the abstract

A new marine pollution governance assessment framework applied to EU tyre wear particle regulation reveals that while recent policies encourage more preventive tyre design approaches, the growing market power of tyre and car manufacturers creates governance tension. Tyre wear particles are among the largest sources of microplastic pollution in aquatic environments, making effective regulatory frameworks essential for addressing this underregulated contamination pathway.

Article

Multi-level governance of Arctic marine plastic pollution: effectiveness and enhancement approaches

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined the multi-level governance framework for Arctic marine plastic pollution across global (UNCLOS, MARPOL), regional (Arctic Council's PAME, AMAP), and national dimensions, finding that effectiveness is constrained by regime robustness and state capacity. The authors argued that effectively tackling marine plastic pollution in the Arctic requires integrating Arctic concerns into global governance agendas, building multidimensional regional frameworks, and enhancing Arctic states' governance capacity while incorporating Indigenous community perspectives.

Article Tier 2

Direction of Measures against Ocean Plastic Debris Problem with a Look at Fishing Gear

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper discusses the direction of policy measures and collective action needed to address the ocean plastic debris problem, likely drawing on international regulatory frameworks and multi-stakeholder approaches. Effective governance is essential for reducing the flow of plastic into the oceans at a meaningful scale.

Article Tier 2

Governing a Continent of Trash: The Global Politics of Oceanic Pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

This political science thesis examines the governance challenges of ocean plastic pollution using the Great Pacific Garbage Patch as a focal case, analyzing why sovereignty constraints and balance-of-power dynamics impede effective international responses. Researchers reviewed bilateral, multilateral, and unilateral governance approaches and proposed an ideal governance model for ocean plastics. The thesis contributes to the literature on global commons governance and plastic pollution policy.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper