We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Mitigating Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints While Enhancing Ecosystem Economic Benefits via Strategic Application of Slow-Release Fertilizer and Mulching
AI summary Read the abstract
A panel study of 485 Chinese agricultural enterprises found that normative, punitive, incentive, and service regulations all promote safe production through dual pathways of knowledge acquisition and risk awareness, with these mechanisms playing complementary rather than competing roles. Effective regulatory frameworks that build both technical capacity and risk culture are equally applicable to managing plastic input use — including plastic mulch — in agricultural systems.
Dryland farming on the Loess Plateau faces significant challenges due to water scarcity and low nitrogen use efficiency. Although conventional urea sustains crop yields, it is associated with elevated greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen losses. Despite growing interest in both slow-release fertilizers and plastic mulching, their environmental footprints remain insufficiently evaluated. This study, therefore, aimed to identify a management strategy that maximizes productivity while minimizing environmental impacts. Using a life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework, we compared four cultivation strategies, flat cultivation with urea (NU), flat cultivation with slow-release fertilizer (NS), mulching with urea (PU), and mulching with slow-release fertilizer (PS), each at nitrogen rates of 125, 225, and 325 kg ha−1. The results demonstrated that PS reduced the carbon footprint per unit of net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) by 3.74–27.86% and the nitrogen footprint per unit of NEEB by 10.48–47.41%. At 225 kg ha−1, PS increased grain yield and NEEB by 7.40% and 9.87%, respectively, compared to 125 kg ha−1. Compared to 325 kg ha−1, the 225 kg ha−1 rate improved energy use efficiency by 19.81% while reducing carbon emissions, carbon, and nitrogen footprint per unit of NEEB by 10.29%, 14.36%, and 24.47%, respectively. In conclusion, mulching combined with slow-release fertilizer at 225 kg ha−1 represents a balanced and regionally appropriate strategy, achieving strong agronomic performance alongside reduced environmental costs and improved economic returns.
More Papers Like This
Can dual mulching outperform single mulching in arid agriculture—Loess Plateau? A meta‐analysis based on crop yield and water use efficiency
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compares the performance of dual mulching systems — combining two types of plastic film or layering strategies — against single mulching in arid agricultural environments. Results indicate that dual mulching better conserves soil moisture, moderates temperature extremes, and improves crop yields under water-limited conditions. However, the authors also note increased plastic residue accumulation as a trade-off requiring careful management to prevent long-term soil contamination.
Mitigation of the Ratio of Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon to Available Phosphorus Effectively Improves Crop Productivity under Mulching Measures on the Loess Plateau
AI summary Read the abstract
This study investigated how different mulching measures affect soil stoichiometric ratios of dissolved organic carbon to available phosphorus in the Loess Plateau, finding that strategic mulching can mitigate nutrient imbalances and support sustainable agriculture in this erosion-prone region.
The field mulching could improve sustainability of spring maize production on the Loess Plateau
AI summary Read the abstract
This study evaluated field mulching impacts on yield stability, soil water storage, nitrogen budget, and soil total nitrogen in spring maize production on the Loess Plateau over multiple years, finding that plastic film mulching improved productivity but raised concerns about microplastic accumulation and nitrogen cycling disruption.
Optimized Farmland Mulching Improves Rainfed Maize Productivity by Regulating Soil Temperature and Phenology on the Loess Plateau in China
AI summary Read the abstract
A field experiment on the Loess Plateau found that combining plastic film mulch with straw mulch regulated soil temperature and extended the grain-filling period of rainfed maize, preventing premature senescence and improving yields. The study highlights a trade-off in dryland agriculture: plastic mulch conserves moisture but overheats soil, while novel double-mulching patterns can mitigate the temperature problem while still relying on plastic film.
Analysis of Carbon Reduction Benefits of Ecological Plastic Film Promotion and Use in Qingcheng Town, Shanxi Province
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers applied life cycle assessment using SimaPro software to calculate the carbon footprint of ecological plastic mulch film compared to conventional 0.01 mm PE film in Qingcheng Town, Shanxi Province, China. Results showed ecological film reduced carbon emissions by 30.8-40.0% without humus substitution, rising to 70.2-74.2% when humus replacement of chemical fertilisers was factored in, with the largest reductions occurring during final treatment.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.