0
Article Sign in to save

Sustainability in Textiles: Life Cycle Assessment of Polyester and Cotton Production with Dissolution Recycling Pathways

Wear 2026

AI summary Read the abstract

A life cycle assessment of dissolving equal-ratio polyester-cotton textile blends with DMSO found that dissolution recycling generates lower energy consumption and carbon emissions than incineration, demonstrating a more sustainable pathway for recovering synthetic fibers from mixed textile waste. Diverting synthetic textiles from landfill and incineration through dissolution recycling reduces the generation of polyester microplastics that enter soil and water during fiber degradation.

The textile waste was disposed of in landfills or incinerated, which causes environmental pollution and resource depletion. Alternatively, dissolution is an alternative solution due to its potential for recycling and resource recovery. Due to the importance of sustainable assessment on introducing alternative solutions, the life cycle assessment was conducted to determine the environmental impacts and feasibility of the dissolution. This study specifically uses an equal ratio of blended polyester and cotton textile waste via solvent dissolution with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework based on International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14044:2006) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14040:2006) was used to identify environmental hotspots, estimate energy and resource needs, and recommend process improvements. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) was conducted in terms of ReCiPe, both midpoint and endpoint indicators, and Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) impact categories. The assessment encompasses key stages, including raw material extraction, processing, and dissolution, focusing on energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and resource efficiency. Findings show that dissolution recycling promises a sustainable solution because the dissolution method uses lower energy utilities and lower carbon emissions than the incineration process (Nordahl, 2023). In conclusion, this study helps to solve knowledge gaps in advanced recycling technologies for blended textiles and promotes the adoption of sustainable practices in textile waste management and circular economy activities.

More Papers Like This

Review

Life cycle assessment applications to reuse, recycling and circular practices for textiles: A review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review of 45 life cycle assessment studies on textile waste management found that separate collection followed by reuse yields the greatest environmental benefits, while textile incineration with mixed municipal waste is the second-largest contributor to climate change after plastics.

Article

Uncertainty of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Blended Textiles

AI summary Read the abstract

This study assessed the environmental impact uncertainty of cotton-polyester blended textiles using life cycle assessment, finding that gaps in inventory data produce results varying by up to 772% from baseline scenarios, highlighting the need for standardized reporting before reliable environmental assessments of blended fabrics are possible.

Article Tier 2

Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review of life cycle assessments for the textile industry identified key environmental impact hotspots across the supply chain, finding that fiber production and dyeing processes dominate environmental burdens and that eco-design strategies offer the greatest improvement potential.

Article

Avaliação do Ciclo de vida na Indústria Têxtil: Um Estudo Bibliométrico

AI summary Read the abstract

A bibliometric analysis of life cycle assessment research in the textile industry identified three main research clusters covering sustainability, waste management, and direct environmental impacts including microplastic pollution. The study found that while interest in sustainable textile practices is growing, research specifically combining LCA with the textile industry remains limited.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Life cycle assessment in fashion industry: a systematic review

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review of life cycle assessments in the fashion industry (2010-2024) found persistent methodological inconsistencies that undermine the reliability of sustainability claims. The review identifies microplastic emissions from textiles as a growing but poorly incorporated impact category, highlighting a gap in understanding the full environmental footprint of clothing.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper