0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Ceramic Membranes to Separate Anthropogenic Microparticles from Wastewater Sludge Centrate

Water Air & Soil Pollution 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
S. Navajas-Valiente, Silvia Álvarez-Blanco, José Antonio Mendoza-Roca, M. Amparo Bes-Piá

Summary

Researchers evaluated ceramic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes for removing microplastics from the liquid centrate stream in wastewater sludge dewatering, finding that while all membranes fully rejected particles larger than 50 µm, multi-channel ultrafiltration membranes achieved up to 95% efficiency for fragments but only 70% for fibers, and cross-contamination remained an unsolved challenge.

Abstract The liquid stream produced during the dewatering of digested sludge in wastewater treatment plants contains significant concentrations of anthropogenic microparticles. Generally, this stream is recirculated into the wastewater line, reintroducing these microparticles into the treatment system. This study focuses on separating these microparticles using ceramic membranes of microfiltration and ultrafiltration. An in-depth research on cross-contamination was also conducted, including tests in the laboratory plant without and with membranes using deionized water (non-doped and doped with polypropylene microplastics). Both multi-channel and single-channel ceramic membranes configurations, composed of $${\text{ZrO}}_{2}$$ ZrO 2 - $${\text{TiO}}_{2}$$ TiO 2 with a $${\text{TiO}}_{2}$$ TiO 2 support structure with different molecular weight cut-offs (1 kDa, 50 kDa, 150 kDa, and 1.4 µm pore size) were compared to determine which provided better microparticle retention. All membranes achieved 100% rejection of the doped microplastics, which were larger than 50 µm. However, other unknown microparticles, not intentionally added but naturally present in the samples, consistently appeared in the permeates. Specifically for ultrafiltration membranes, when using non-doped MP centrate as feed, the results indicate that multi-channel membranes achieved up to 95% separation efficiency for fragment-shaped microparticles and around 70% for fiber-shaped microparticles. In contrast, single-channel membranes with the same cut-off as the multi-channel membranes showed approximately 50% efficiency for fragments without separating fibers. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that ultrafiltration of centrate does not guarantee a microparticle-free permeate. Several factors contributed to this, microparticle accumulation in the system, the characteristics of the microfibers and microfragments in the centrate, and even cross-contamination.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Reuse of Water in Laundry Applications with Micro- and Ultrafiltration Ceramic Membrane

Microfiltration and ultrafiltration ceramic membranes were compared for the treatment of laundry wastewater containing microfibers, with both membranes achieving high microfiber removal while the ultrafiltration membrane provided better water quality for reuse. The study supports ceramic membrane filtration as an effective approach to capturing textile microplastics at the point of washing.

Article Tier 2

Application of Hybrid Ceramic Membranes for Microplastic and Nanoplastic Separation and Improved Wastewater Treatment

This study evaluated hybrid ceramic membrane filtration combined with anaerobic digestion for removing micro- and nanoplastics from wastewater. The system achieved high removal efficiencies and showed that membrane filtration is a promising technology for reducing plastic particles before effluent discharge.

Article Tier 2

Partitioning of removal of microplastics and other anthropogenic particles among influent, biosolids and final effluent in a tertiary wastewater treatment plant

Researchers tracked the partitioning of microplastics and other anthropogenic particles across influent, biosolids, ultrafiltration membrane flows, and final effluent in a tertiary wastewater treatment plant, finding that 99% of particles were retained in biosolids while fewer than 1% passed through to final effluent. The study revealed that fiber morphologies dominated influent and effluent while fragments dominated biosolids, and that ultrafiltration membrane performance varied with operational condition.

Article Tier 2

Enrichment of nutrients from anaerobically digested centrate minimizing microplastics content using a combination of membrane processes

Researchers analyzed microplastic content in centrate — the nutrient-rich liquid effluent from sludge dewatering in wastewater treatment plants — and applied ultrafiltration and forward osmosis membrane processes to simultaneously concentrate nutrients and reduce microplastic contamination. The study demonstrated that combining membrane technologies can effectively minimize microplastic content in centrate while enriching ammonium-nitrogen and phosphates for potential nutrient recovery applications.

Article Tier 2

Enrichment of nutrients from anaerobically digested centrate minimizing microplastics content using a combination of membrane processes

Researchers analyzed microplastic content in centrate — the nutrient-rich liquid effluent from sludge dewatering in wastewater treatment plants — and applied ultrafiltration and forward osmosis membrane processes to simultaneously concentrate nutrients and reduce microplastic contamination. The study demonstrated that combining membrane technologies can effectively minimize microplastic content in centrate while enriching ammonium-nitrogen and phosphates for potential nutrient recovery applications.

Share this paper