0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

The fate of orally ingested microplastics during cooperative brood care in two social Hymenoptera species

2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Gwen Büchner, Sven Ritschar Christian Laforsch, Jona Schmitt, Christian Laforsch, Jona Schmitt, Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Gwen Büchner, Gwen Büchner, Gwen Büchner, Gwen Büchner, Gwen Büchner, Jona Schmitt, Gwen Büchner, Sven Ritschar Max V R Doering, Heike Feldhaar, Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Jona Schmitt, Jona Schmitt, Christian Laforsch, Jona Schmitt, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Volker Dittmann, Volker Dittmann, Heike Feldhaar, Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Heike Feldhaar, Sven Ritschar Lotta Steinbrenner, Lotta Steinbrenner, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Sven Ritschar Annalena Ter-Heide, Annalena Ter-Heide, Annalena Ter-Heide, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Annalena Ter-Heide, Heike Feldhaar, Sven Ritschar Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Volker Dittmann, Volker Dittmann, Volker Dittmann, Volker Dittmann, Heike Feldhaar, Sven Ritschar Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Lotta Steinbrenner, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Lotta Steinbrenner, Lotta Steinbrenner, Lotta Steinbrenner, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Sven Ritschar Sven Ritschar Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Heike Feldhaar, Christian Laforsch, Christian Laforsch, Sven Ritschar

Summary

Researchers exposed carpenter ant and bumblebee colonies to polystyrene microplastics and tracked particle fate during cooperative brood care, finding that ants' infrabuccal pocket effectively filtered particles and prevented larval exposure, while bumblebee larvae ingested microplastics transferred directly from workers, suggesting colony-level MP risks differ markedly by species anatomy.

<title>Abstract</title> Anthropogenic pollutants contribute to insect decline in terrestrial ecosystems. Microplastics (MP), a major pollutant, are already present in all ecosystems and expected to further accumulate. In social insects, negative effects of MP could not only manifest on individual but also colony level due to cooperative brood care. However, food is transferred differently during cooperative brood care among social Hymenoptera species. Therefore, it can also vary whether particles are passed on with food. Consequently, depending on the strategy of food transfer, the different life stages of a species could be affected by MP to varying degrees. To better assess interspecific differences, we comparatively investigated the fate of polystyrene MP particles during cooperative brood care in colonies of the Japanese carpenter ant ( <italic>Camponotus japonicus</italic> ) and the buff-tailed bumblebee ( <italic>Bombus terrestris</italic> ). Here we show that both, ant and bumblebee workers, ingested MP particles with their food. However, we only found MP particles in the digestive system of bumblebee workers and larvae, but not in ant larvae and only occasionally in workers. This is likely due to the infrabuccal pocket (IBP), only present in the ants, that effectively prevents the transfer of particulate matter within colonies during cooperative brood care. In contrast, the unobstructed transfer of MP from bumblebee workers to larvae may entail negative effects on larvae or carry-over effects during development. Thus, negative colony-level effects of MP particles on social Hymenoptera may be exacerbated in those species that lack an IBP.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper