0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Goals in Nutrition Science 2025–2030

Frontiers in Nutrition 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Elliot M. Berry, Johannes le Coutre, Bárbara Ramalho Ladeira Cardoso, Elliot M. Berry, Sean B. Cash, David Raubenheimer, Igor Pravst, Alejandro Cifuentes Elena Ibáñez, Igor Pravst, Johannes le Coutre, María Carmen Collado, Alejandro Cifuentes Johannes le Coutre, J. Bruce German, Elena Ibáñez, Alejandro Cifuentes J. Bruce German, Mark Lawrence, Mark Lawrence, David C. Nieman, Igor Pravst, David C. Nieman, David Raubenheimer, Prof. Dr. Michael Rychlik, Andrew Scholey, Andrew Scholey, Annalisa Terranegra, Angela M. Zivkovic, Mark Lawrence, Alejandro Cifuentes

Summary

This research summary argues that nutrition science needs to change how it approaches food problems over the next five years (2025-2030). Instead of studying single nutrients or foods in isolation, scientists say we need to look at the whole food system—including how climate change, economics, and social factors all affect what people can access and eat. This matters because our current approach isn't solving major nutrition and food security problems, and we need better strategies to ensure everyone has healthy, sustainable food as global challenges increase.

Already in its third edition, the Goals in Nutrition Science platform covers a five-year timeframe per volume, thus spanning 15 years from 2015 to 2030 ( 1 , 2 ). This period aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals, and, in practice, these 5-year updates do capture major shifts in the field. As the second quarter of the 21st century unfolds, it increasingly appears that much of the widely promoted food technology has not delivered or is not yet ready. Nutrition, food security, and sustainability are therefore best treated as inseparable challenges within complex, adaptive food systems, where progress depends on addressing biology, behavior, markets, policy, and environmental constraints together rather than through isolated, linear interventions. Nutrition science matters because it sits at the hinge between human biology and the real-world conditions that determine what people can access, afford, choose, and safely consume. As food systems become more interconnected and more exposed to climate, conflict, and market volatility, the field is shifting from mainly reductionist problem solving toward approaches that can handle feedback, tradeoffs, and equity in context. Pursuing the goals set out here is not only a scientific agenda, but a planetary health imperative: sustainable food systems must secure current and future nutrition while balancing environmental stewardship, health, and socio-economic stability across the pathway from production to consumption and waste. Overall, the agenda points toward a new chapter of nutrition science that integrates the right level of complexity by combining deep disciplinary insight with better integrated systems approaches, and by mobilizing coordinated action. Johannes le Coutre, Field Chief Editor, Frontiers in Nutrition.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper