0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

A game-changer for qualitative research: artificial intelligence as an efficient tool for analyzing student conceptions about microplastics

Frontiers in Education 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Justus Braune, Cathérine Conradty, Franz X. Bogner, Jürgen Paul

Summary

Researchers found that AI can analyze student responses about microplastics just as accurately as human experts, but much faster. This breakthrough could help scientists and teachers study what people know about microplastics - tiny plastic particles that can harm our health - without spending months sorting through responses by hand. Better understanding of public knowledge about microplastics could lead to more effective health education and policy decisions.

Qualitative content analysis of learners’ conceptions is due to large datasets time-consuming. This study examined the potential of a Large Language Model (LLM) to support and accelerate qualitative content analysis without compromising validity. Written responses from 180 bachelor students at two German universities to four open-ended questions on microplastics were analysed. ChatGPT was used to inductively develop categories and to assign responses. Two human expert coders conducted the same procedures for comparison purposes. The inter-rater reliability was calculated using Cohen’s kappa and two independent ChatGPT runs were performed to test consistency. The categorization system generated by ChatGPT largely corresponded to the human-developed system. The two ChatGPT runs showed highly consistent classifications, with inter-rater reliabilities of up to κ = 0.96. That exceeded both intra- and inter-rater agreement of the human coders ( κ = 0.45–0.90). Overall, our findings suggest that LLMs can support valid and reliable qualitative content analysis while substantially reducing analysis time. In this respect, the use of LLMs may represent a methodological game-changer for qualitative research, making such approaches more efficient and accessible, also for classroom teachers.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Using artificial intelligence tools for data quality evaluation in the context of microplastic human health risk assessments

Researchers tested whether AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini could help evaluate the quality of microplastics research studies, a task that is normally slow and inconsistent when done manually. The AI tools proved effective at extracting information and assessing study reliability, which could speed up the process of identifying trustworthy data for assessing how microplastics affect human health.

Article Tier 2

Leveraging AI tools for microplastic data quality assessment

Researchers explored how AI tools can improve data quality assessment in microplastic studies, which vary widely in methodological rigor. The approach aims to standardize quality evaluation so that human health risk assessments based on microplastic research are more reliable.

Article Tier 2

Deep learning-powered efficient characterization and quantification of microplastics

Researchers developed an artificial intelligence framework that uses deep learning to automatically identify and quantify microplastics from infrared spectra and visual images. The system achieved high accuracy in classifying plastic types and counting particles, dramatically reducing the time needed compared to manual analysis. This tool could make large-scale microplastic monitoring faster and more consistent across different research laboratories.

Article Tier 2

Leveraging AI tools for microplastic data quality assessment

This study explored how AI tools can be used to assess data quality in microplastic research, addressing the challenge that studies are conducted at widely varying quality levels. AI-assisted quality assessment identified key sources of uncertainty and bias, providing a scalable approach to evaluate the reliability of the growing body of microplastic exposure and effects literature.

Article Tier 2

Artificial intelligence-empowered collection and characterization of microplastics: A review

This review examines how artificial intelligence tools like robots and machine learning are being used to collect, identify, and characterize microplastic pollution more efficiently. Better detection technology matters for human health because accurately measuring microplastic contamination in water and soil is the first step toward understanding and reducing our exposure.

Share this paper