We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparing apples and oranges: Using the MPsizeBase and power law size distribution to extrapolate and inter-compare microplastic concentrations
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists analyzed 90 studies and found that most research severely undercounts microplastics in our environment because current methods miss the tiniest particles, which make up about 70% of all plastic pollution in the ocean. The researchers created new equations to help scientists get more accurate counts by accounting for all particle sizes, from microscopic fragments to larger pieces. This better understanding of how much plastic pollution is really out there is crucial for figuring out the true risks to human health from breathing and eating these particles.
Studies reporting environmental MP concentration rarely cover the full MP size range of 1 to 5000 µm due to sampling and analytical limitations. However, microplastic (MP) number concentration in the environment increases exponentially with decreasing particle size. This leads to difficulties in the intercomparison of studies, which is critical for environmental and human health risk assessment. Indeed, for the same MP sample, a study observing the small MP fraction (1-300 µm for ex.) will report a higher number concentration than another study observing the large MP fraction (300-5000 µm) of the same sample.In this presentation, we summarize the current understanding of the MP particle size distribution (PSD), based on the power law model (Segur et al., 2025). We confront the power law model with 90 published MP PSD observations from the literature, compiled in the new MPsizeBase open access database (Sonke et al., 2025). We show that the MP PSD power law slope is influenced by particle shape (fragments, fibers), but does not vary significantly between environmental compartment studied (surface ocean, deep ocean and atmosphere).We propose simple equations to extrapolate MP concentrations for the limited observed size range to the full MP size range (1 to 5000 µm), or any other sub-size range, for both MP number and mass concentrations. By comparting the observed MP concentrations to the corrected full size range MP concentration, we show that the 90 published studies underestimated MP number concentrations.The MP number PSD is dominated by small fragments: in the surface ocean, we estimate that 70% of MP particles have a diameter between 1 and 2 µm. Conversely, we also show that the MP mass PSD is dominated by large particles and estimate that, for surface ocean MP, common plankton nets (mesh size 300 - 330 µm) only catch 0.003% of all MP particles (in number), but 94% of MP mass. This indicates the need to express results both in term of numeric and mass concentration. To do so, we provide simple equations to convert a numeric PSD to mass PSD. ReferencesSegur, T., Hough, I., Dobiasova, N., Voisin, D., Richon, C., Angot, H., Thomas, J. L., and Sonke, J. E.: Using the power law size distribution to extrapolate and compare microplastic number and mass concentrations in environmental media, Research Square preprint, https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-8524083/v1, 2025.Sonke, J. E., Segur, T., Hough, I., Dobiasova, N., Voisin, D., Yakovenko, N., Margenat, H., Hagelskjaer, O., Abbasi, S., Bucci, S., Richon, C., Angot, H., Thomas, J. L., and Le Roux, G.: MPsizeBase: a database for particle size distributed environmental microplastic data, EarthArXiv, preprint, https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/10605/, 2025.
More Papers Like This
Using the power law size distribution to extrapolate and compare microplastic number and mass concentrations in environmental media
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists have found that most studies measuring microplastic pollution actually miss the vast majority of particles because they can't detect the smallest ones—and when researchers use math to account for these tiny missed particles, the true number of microplastics in oceans and air is about 700 times higher than previously reported. This matters because tinier plastic particles are the ones most likely to enter our bodies and cells, so accurately counting them is a crucial step toward understanding real health risks and comparing pollution levels across different studies and locations.
Using the power law size distribution to extrapolate and compare microplastic number and mass concentrations in environmental media
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that we're likely breathing in 35 to 130 times more tiny plastic particles than previously thought because current methods miss the smallest pieces. By developing a new way to estimate the full amount of microplastics in air and water, researchers discovered that these microscopic plastic fragments are everywhere around us in much higher concentrations. This matters for human health because we're constantly breathing and consuming these particles, but we need better data to understand the true risks to our bodies.
Using the power law size distribution to extrapolate and compare microplastic number and mass concentrations in environmental media
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a method using power law particle size distributions to extrapolate and compare microplastic concentrations across studies that sample different size ranges. They found that fragment size distributions are steeper than fiber distributions, reflecting different fragmentation processes, and that apparent discrepancies between surface ocean and deep water concentrations largely disappear when size ranges are aligned. The approach offers a standardized framework for comparing microplastic data across environmental studies.
How Back-Calculation and Particle Size Assumptions in Lab-Based Methods Can Significantly Alter Reported Microplastic and Nanoplastic Particle Counts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers demonstrated that back-calculating microplastic particle counts from bulk mass measurements introduces orders-of-magnitude variability depending on assumed particle size, geometry, and density — meaning reported concentration differences across studies may reflect methodological assumptions rather than real environmental differences.
How Back-Calculation and Particle Size Assumptions in Lab-Based Methods Can Significantly Alter Reported Microplastic and Nanoplastic Particle Counts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers demonstrated that back-calculating microplastic particle counts from bulk mass measurements introduces orders-of-magnitude variability depending on assumed particle size, geometry, and density — meaning reported concentration differences across studies may reflect methodological assumptions rather than real environmental differences.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.