0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Effects of chronic exposure to environmentally realistic microplastics on Daphnia magna: importance of particle size and morphology and implications for risk assessments

The Science of The Total Environment 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Safeerul Islam Hashmi, Andrew Barrick, James A. Stoeckel, Dengjun Wang, Bernardo Chaves-Cordoba, Nhung H.A. Nguyen, Alena Ševců, Jana Novotna, Tham C. Hoang

Summary

Scientists tested how tiny plastic particles from everyday items like nylon fibers and polystyrene cups affect small water creatures called Daphnia over 21 days. They found that these microplastics get eaten by the creatures and can harm their ability to reproduce and grow, especially the fiber-shaped plastics. This matters because it shows how plastic pollution in water can damage aquatic life, and since microplastics are also found in our drinking water and food, understanding these effects helps us better assess potential risks to human health.

Most ecotoxicity research with microplastics (MPs) in laboratories uses primary MPs, such as plastic microbeads. The present study aimed to determine the effects of three environmentally representative MPs: nylon and Kevlar microfibers and polystyrene cup fragments on Daphnia magna. The organisms were exposed to each MP type at five test concentrations (0.0064, 0.064, 0.25, 2.5, and 25 mg/L) for 21 days to investigate MP uptake and effects on survivorship, growth, and reproduction. Daphnia magna ingested all MP types and the uptake concentration increased logarithmically with exposure concentration. Microplastics did not significantly affect survival. However, reproduction was significantly reduced at high nylon microfibers concentrations (2.5 and 25 mg/L). Dry weights of D. magna were also significantly lower than the control when exposed to nylon microfibers at 0.064, 2.5, and 25 mg/L. Ingested MPs exhibited a strong and positive correlation with MPs concentration in water. Significant negative correlations were found between body size and ingested MPs and MPs in water of cup MP experiments. Particle size distribution analysis indicated a size-selective ingestion by D. magna. The effects of MPs on D. magna appeared to be influenced by particle size and surface morphology. Results of the present study are useful for ecological risk assessment for MPs. More studies across species are needed to further understand how MP type and uptake relate to biological effects, which is necessary for ecological risk assessment and management of MP pollution.

Share this paper