0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Sign in to save

Global cigarette butt contamination: a review

Environmental Chemistry Letters 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Victor Vasques Ribeiro, Victor Vasques Ribeiro, Victor Vasques Ribeiro, Victor Vasques Ribeiro, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre André Salem Szklo, Victor Vasques Ribeiro, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Lucas Buruaem Moreira, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Lucas Buruaem Moreira, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Graziele Ribeiro Grilo, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Graziele Ribeiro Grilo, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Danilo Freitas Rangel, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Danilo Freitas Rangel, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Lucas Buruaem Moreira, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre André Salem Szklo, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Lucas Buruaem Moreira, Lucas Buruaem Moreira, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre

Summary

This review of 130 studies found that cigarette butts are everywhere in our environment—averaging about 1 butt for every 4 square meters globally—and they're especially common on beaches and in water where people swim and fish. These toxic cigarette filters break down into harmful chemicals and microplastics that can contaminate our water and food supply. The good news is that well-protected areas like national parks have nearly 10 times fewer cigarette butts, showing that proper management can reduce this health threat.

Cigarette butts are toxic, persistent, and represent one of the most frequently littered waste worldwide, with trillions cigarette butts entering the environment annually, yet their global distribution is poorly known. In particular, the influence of protected areas is unclear. Here, we review cigarette butt contamination across 55 countries from 2013 to 2024, with a meta-analysis of 130 peer-reviewed studies and 2,723 records to assess protected areas influence, spatiotemporal trends, and classify levels. Results show that the global average density was 0.24 cigarette butts per square meter, with pronounced geographic variability. Hotspots occurred in 17 countries, especially in Asia and Latin America. Aquatic environments, notably beaches, exhibited higher contamination, reflecting recreational pressure and higher monitoring coverage. Cigarette butts constituted 12% of all aquatic litter on average, exceeding 50% in several countries. The 165 protected areas monitored in 37 countries displayed markedly lower contamination, reducing it by nearly fivefold compared to unprotected areas, i.e., 0.06 versus 0.29 cigarette butts per square meter. Contamination declined consistently along a protection gradient from unprotected to unclassified, multiple use, and no take protected areas, with the latter one, the most restrictive, achieving nearly tenfold reductions, averaging 0.03 cigarette butts per square meter. Over time, contamination levels remained stable in unprotected areas, and showed slight decreases in protected areas, indicating early signs of management effectiveness. We introduce a standardized index for interpreting contamination levels.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper