0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Critical water quality limits for aquatic freshwater biodiversity 

2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Albert Nkwasa, Maria Theresa Nakkazi, Taher Kahil Kyle J. Brumm, Ann van Griensven, Taher Kahil Taher Kahil

Summary

This review summarizes existing research on how pollution affects freshwater animals like fish, frogs, and other water creatures. Scientists found that many types of pollution—including nutrients from fertilizers, metals, plastics, and chemicals like PFAS—can harm or kill these animals, but we still don't know the safe limits for many pollutants. This matters because polluted water that harms wildlife often affects the water we drink and use, so protecting freshwater animals helps protect human health too.

Freshwater ecosystems host a disproportionate share of global biodiversity yet are increasingly exposed to declining water quality driven by nutrient enrichment, chemical contamination, thermal stress, salinisation, and emerging pollutants. While water quality standards and regulatory limits exist for many constituents, their relevance for safeguarding freshwater biodiversity remains fragmented, taxon-specific, and unevenly documented across regions and ecosystem types. This review synthesises current knowledge on critical water quality limits associated with adverse responses of freshwater biodiversity, with a focus on identifying lethal and sublethal thresholds across major aquatic taxa and key water quality constituents.We systematically assess reported biodiversity responses covering fish, amphibians, macroinvertebrates, reptiles, freshwater-adapted mammals, and where evidence exists, groundwater-associated biota to changes in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), temperature, dissolved oxygen, biochemical oxygen demand, salinity, suspended sediments, metals, plastics, pharmaceuticals, and contaminants of emerging concern, including PFAS and microplastics. Reported thresholds are evaluated across lentic and lotic systems to account for ecosystem-specific sensitivities. Where possible, we distinguish between acute (lethal) and chronic (sublethal) response levels and document observed exceedance events.Beyond synthesising established thresholds, the review explicitly highlights constituents for which biodiversity-relevant limits are poorly defined or absent, as well as geographic regions where water quality degradation is likely occurring but biodiversity impacts remain under-reported. By consolidating dispersed evidence and identifying critical gaps, this review aims to support biodiversity-relevant water quality assessments, inform monitoring and modelling efforts, and provide a foundation for integrating ecological thresholds into freshwater management and policy frameworks under accelerating global change.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper