0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

A job exposure matrix for occupational exposure to airborne micro and nanoplastics (PlastiXJEM®) and associations with respiratory outcomes

2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Gwenda F. Vasse, Nienke Vrisekoop, Joelle AZ Klazen, Judith M. Vonk, Barbro N. Melgert

Summary

Researchers studied over 136,000 people and found that workers with high exposure to airborne microplastics and nanoplastics had reduced lung function and more breathing problems like shortness of breath and asthma. Jobs with the highest plastic particle exposure included those in manufacturing, construction, and textile work. While this study only looked at one point in time, it suggests that breathing in tiny plastic particles at work may harm lung health and warrants more research into protecting workers.

Background: Microplastics and nanoplastics (MNP) are an increasingly recognized component of airborne particulate matter, yet their impact on respiratory health is unclear. This study aimed to develop a job exposure matrix (JEM) for occupational exposure to airborne MNP (PlastiXJEM®) and examine its association with respiratory outcomes in the Lifelines cohort. Methods: Four experts scored occupational airborne MNP exposure levels (none, low, high) for all ISCO–08 occupations based on documented sources and published evidence. After consensus, the PlastiXJEM® was applied to baseline current or last–held jobs of 136,928 adult Lifelines participants. Cross–sectional and longitudinal associations with lung function, respiratory symptoms, and asthma were assessed using linear and logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, height, BMI, and co–exposure to organic dust, gasses and fumes, pesticides, metals, solvents and silica. Results: High exposure was associated with lower FEV₁ (–43 ml; 95% CI: –61 ;–25), lower FVC (–47 ml( –69 ;–26)), lower FEV1%FVC (–0.26 % ( –0.51 ;–0.00) and higher odds of airway obstruction, respiratory symptoms and asthma (e.g. dyspnea OR=1.58; 1.34–1.87). Low exposure was associated with lower FEV1 and FVC in women only. Associations were attenuated after adjustment for socio-economic status but remained for FEV₁, airway obstruction and dyspnea. MNP exposure was not associated with accelerated lung function decline or with the development of airway obstruction, respiratory symptoms, or asthma. Conclusion: Occupational exposure to airborne MNP is associated with lower lung function and a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms in this cohort. These findings warrant further investigation with complete occupational histories.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Microplastics inhalation and their effects on human health: a systematic review

This systematic review examines how breathing in microplastics affects human health. It finds that airborne microplastics can reach the lungs and may trigger inflammation, oxidative stress, and respiratory issues, with workers in textile and plastic industries facing the highest exposure levels.

Article Tier 2

Airborne microplastics: Consequences to human health?

Researchers reviewed existing evidence on airborne microplastics and their potential effects on human respiratory health. Studies of workers exposed to plastic fibers and particles have documented airway inflammation and breathing difficulties, suggesting that susceptible individuals may face health risks even from environmental concentrations. The paper calls for greater awareness and future research into the health consequences of inhaling microplastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic and plastic pollution: impact on respiratory disease and health

This review pulls together evidence from lab studies, animal experiments, and workplace exposure research showing that inhaled micro- and nanoplastics can affect lung tissue and may contribute to respiratory diseases. However, the authors stress that it remains unclear how much damage occurs at the levels of plastic particles people actually breathe in daily life, highlighting the need for better measurements of real-world exposure.

Article Tier 2

Breathing plastics: Influence of airborne microplastics on the respiratory microbiome and health of human lungs (Review)

Researchers reviewed evidence showing that inhaled airborne microplastics can physically interact with the microbial community living in human lungs, disrupting its balance and triggering inflammation linked to conditions like asthma and fibrosis. Because microplastic particles have been found in lung tissue and fluid samples, inhalation is now recognized as a significant exposure route with measurable consequences for respiratory health.

Article Tier 2

Airborne micro- and nanoplastics: emerging causes of respiratory diseases

This review examines growing evidence that tiny airborne plastic particles can enter the lungs and trigger or worsen respiratory diseases including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung inflammation. The smallest nanoplastics are especially concerning because they can penetrate deep into lung tissue and even enter the bloodstream, yet research on airborne plastic health effects significantly lags behind studies on waterborne exposure.

Share this paper