We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
BPS and BPF are as Carcinogenic as BPA and are Not Viable Alternatives for its Replacement.
Summary
This review presents evidence that BPS and BPF — chemicals used as 'BPA-free' replacements in plastics — have similar cancer-promoting and endocrine-disrupting properties to BPA itself. The substitution of one hormone-disrupting plastic chemical with nearly identical alternatives means consumers are not actually avoiding the health risks they are trying to escape.
BACKGROUND: Plastic polymers are omnipresent, and life without them is virtually impossible. Despite the advantages provided by the material, conventional plastic also has harmful effects on the environment and human health. Plastics release microplastics and compounds, such as BPA, which is a xenoestrogen and once absorbed by the body, have an affinity for estrogen receptors α and β, acting as an agonist on human cells, being an endocrine disrupter able to cause various diseases and acting as a potential neoplastic inducer. BPS and BPF are BPA's analogs, a proposed solution to solve its harmful effects. The analogs can be found in daily use products and are used in several industrial applications. OBJECTIVES: In the present work, the researchers aimed to conduct a revisional study on BPA's harmful effects on human health, focusing on its carcinogenic potential, discussing its mechanisms of action, as well as its analogs effects, and identifying if BPS and BPF are viable alternatives to BPA's substitution in plastic polymers' production. METHODS: In this review, articles published in the last 15 years related to the different aspects of conventional plastics and BPA were analyzed and revised with precision. The subjects ranged from conventional plastics and the problems related to their large-scale production, BPA, its negative aspects, and the feasibility of using its analogs (BPS and BPF) to replace the compound. The articles were extensively reviewed and concisely discussed. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that BPA has a high carcinogenic potential, with known mechanisms to trigger breast, ovarian, prostate, cervical, and lung cancers, thus elucidating that its analogs are also xenoestrogens, and they can exert similar effects to BPA and, therefore, cannot be considered viable alternatives for its replacement. CONCLUSION: .This study suggests that new research should be carried out to develop such alternatives, allowing the substitution of plastic materials containing BPA in their composition, such as developing economically viable and sustainable biodegradable bioplastics for socioenvironmental well-being.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Bisphenol A and its analogues: from their occurrence in foodstuffs marketed in Europe to improved monitoring strategies—a review of published literature from 2018 to 2023
This review tracks the levels of bisphenol A (BPA) and similar hormone-disrupting chemicals in food and beverages across Europe from 2018 to 2024. While BPA remains the most commonly detected compound, its substitutes (like BPS and BPF) are increasingly found in food packaging and canned goods. These chemicals mimic estrogen in the body and have been linked to reproductive, metabolic, and developmental health concerns.
Assessment of endocrine-disrupting activities of alternative chemicals for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Researchers assessed the endocrine-disrupting potential of alternative plasticizers used to replace the commonly restricted DEHP (bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate), finding that several substitutes also displayed hormonal activity. The results raise concerns that some replacement plasticizers used in consumer plastics may carry similar health risks as the chemicals they were designed to replace.
Bisphenols—A Threat to the Natural Environment
This review examines the environmental and health threats posed by bisphenol A (BPA) and its replacements, bisphenol F and bisphenol S, which were introduced as safer alternatives. However, because these substitutes have similar chemical structures to BPA, they may pose comparable risks to human health and the environment, including hormone disruption. The study is relevant to microplastics research because bisphenols are common additives in plastics that can leach out as plastics break down into microparticles.
In silico profiling of endocrine-disrupting potential of bisphenol analogues and their halogenated transformation products
Researchers used computer modeling to evaluate the endocrine-disrupting potential of 18 bisphenol A analogues and their halogenated transformation products across 14 human hormone receptors. They found that several BPA replacements showed higher predicted endocrine-disrupting activity than BPA itself, with BPZ and BPPH flagged as the most hazardous. The study also found that halogenation generally increased the binding affinity of bisphenols to hormone receptors, raising concerns about the safety of BPA substitutes in the environment.
Ecotoxicological effects and bioaccumulation of BPA analogues and their mixture in the clam Ruditapes philippinarum
Researchers exposed clams to three common bisphenol A substitutes (BPAF, BPF, and BPS) at environmentally relevant concentrations to evaluate whether these replacement chemicals are truly safer. The study found that all three BPA analogues caused oxidative stress, cellular damage, and neurotoxic effects in clam tissues, suggesting that these widely used substitutes may pose similar ecological risks as the compound they were designed to replace.