We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
BPS and BPF are as Carcinogenic as BPA and are Not Viable Alternatives for its Replacement.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review presents evidence that BPS and BPF — chemicals used as 'BPA-free' replacements in plastics — have similar cancer-promoting and endocrine-disrupting properties to BPA itself. The substitution of one hormone-disrupting plastic chemical with nearly identical alternatives means consumers are not actually avoiding the health risks they are trying to escape.
BACKGROUND: Plastic polymers are omnipresent, and life without them is virtually impossible. Despite the advantages provided by the material, conventional plastic also has harmful effects on the environment and human health. Plastics release microplastics and compounds, such as BPA, which is a xenoestrogen and once absorbed by the body, have an affinity for estrogen receptors α and β, acting as an agonist on human cells, being an endocrine disrupter able to cause various diseases and acting as a potential neoplastic inducer. BPS and BPF are BPA's analogs, a proposed solution to solve its harmful effects. The analogs can be found in daily use products and are used in several industrial applications. OBJECTIVES: In the present work, the researchers aimed to conduct a revisional study on BPA's harmful effects on human health, focusing on its carcinogenic potential, discussing its mechanisms of action, as well as its analogs effects, and identifying if BPS and BPF are viable alternatives to BPA's substitution in plastic polymers' production. METHODS: In this review, articles published in the last 15 years related to the different aspects of conventional plastics and BPA were analyzed and revised with precision. The subjects ranged from conventional plastics and the problems related to their large-scale production, BPA, its negative aspects, and the feasibility of using its analogs (BPS and BPF) to replace the compound. The articles were extensively reviewed and concisely discussed. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that BPA has a high carcinogenic potential, with known mechanisms to trigger breast, ovarian, prostate, cervical, and lung cancers, thus elucidating that its analogs are also xenoestrogens, and they can exert similar effects to BPA and, therefore, cannot be considered viable alternatives for its replacement. CONCLUSION: .This study suggests that new research should be carried out to develop such alternatives, allowing the substitution of plastic materials containing BPA in their composition, such as developing economically viable and sustainable biodegradable bioplastics for socioenvironmental well-being.
More Papers Like This
Bisphenol A and its replacement chemicals as endocrine disruptors and obesogens
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes how bisphenol A (BPA) and its common replacements—BPS, BPF, BPAF, and TMBPF—act as endocrine disruptors that dysregulate hormone receptors and signaling pathways, promoting metabolic disorders and obesity through mechanisms that persist even in supposedly safer substitute chemicals.
Replacement bisphenols, phthalates, and micro-/nanoplastic exposures in human reproductive endocrinology
AI summary Read the abstract
This review pulls together existing research on "BPA-free" plastics, phthalates, and micro/nanoplastics, showing they can all disrupt hormone production through similar pathways in the body, like stress on cells and inflammation. The evidence is strongest for phthalates (common in personal care products and packaging), but still developing for newer plastic chemicals and microplastics. Bottom line: swapping BPA for other plastic chemicals doesn't necessarily make products safer for reproductive health.
Bisphenol A and its analogues: from their occurrence in foodstuffs marketed in Europe to improved monitoring strategies—a review of published literature from 2018 to 2023
AI summary Read the abstract
This review tracks the levels of bisphenol A (BPA) and similar hormone-disrupting chemicals in food and beverages across Europe from 2018 to 2024. While BPA remains the most commonly detected compound, its substitutes (like BPS and BPF) are increasingly found in food packaging and canned goods. These chemicals mimic estrogen in the body and have been linked to reproductive, metabolic, and developmental health concerns.
Assessment of endocrine-disrupting activities of alternative chemicals for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed the endocrine-disrupting potential of alternative plasticizers used to replace the commonly restricted DEHP (bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate), finding that several substitutes also displayed hormonal activity. The results raise concerns that some replacement plasticizers used in consumer plastics may carry similar health risks as the chemicals they were designed to replace.
Bisphenols—A Threat to the Natural Environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental and health threats posed by bisphenol A (BPA) and its replacements, bisphenol F and bisphenol S, which were introduced as safer alternatives. However, because these substitutes have similar chemical structures to BPA, they may pose comparable risks to human health and the environment, including hormone disruption. The study is relevant to microplastics research because bisphenols are common additives in plastics that can leach out as plastics break down into microparticles.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.