We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Further studies in translatable model systems are needed to predict the impacts of human microplastic exposure.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review argues that better animal models are needed to accurately predict the health impacts of microplastic exposure on humans, noting that current studies using aquatic organisms and fish may not translate well to human biology. The authors call for more research using mammalian models and for studies that test environmentally realistic exposure conditions including the chemical cocktails associated with plastic particles.
Microplastics are a pervasive environmental contaminant that have been found in many media including water sources, soils, and foodstuff. Due to the worldwide presence and persistence of microplastic debris, human exposure is inevitable. Human exposure occurs predominantly through ingestion, although dermal and inhalation exposures are probable. Microplastic single exposure studies in aquatic species and fish have shown various toxic effects including those on reproduction and survival. In addition to potential intrinsic toxicity, microplastics often have chemicals adsorbed to their surfaces. Studies report that these chemicals can have innate toxicity that is modulated by the composition of microplastics. Both the impacts of microplastics alone and co-exposures with adsorbed chemicals exhibit size dependent effects. Analysis of the current literature has revealed published studies predominantly investigate the toxicity of microplastic exposure in fish and other aquatic species, with limited knowledge about the effects in mammals and cell lines. Toxicity has been shown to vary widely between taxonomic groups, suggesting inferring human health relevance will require model systems where human routes of exposure can be mimicked. Although it may be difficult to extrapolate the results from aquatic model systems to relevant human health impacts, they may suggest effects to investigate. In order to best estimate the short- and long-term impacts of human microplastic exposure, it is imperative that studies in model systems with increased similarity to human anatomy and cellular processes be done.
More Papers Like This
Further Studies in Translatable Model Systems are Needed to Predict the Impacts of Human Microplastic Exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
This review highlights that humans are inevitably exposed to microplastics through food, drink, and air, but most toxicity studies have been done in aquatic species at unrealistically high doses. The authors call for better experimental models that reflect realistic human exposure before health risks can be fully assessed.
Potential adverse health effects of ingested micro- and nanoplastics on humans. Lessons learned from in vivo and in vitro mammalian models
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compiles recent studies on the effects of ingested micro- and nanoplastics using mammalian in vivo and in vitro models to assess potential human health implications. The authors found that while substantial research effort has been made, significant gaps remain in understanding absorption, biodistribution, and toxicity of these particles in mammalian systems. The review provides recommendations for improved testing methods to generate more relevant and targeted data for human risk assessment.
Decoding microplastic toxicity on human health: navigating translational challenges using organ-on-chip models.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review paper summarizes existing research on how microplastics may affect human health, including the limits of current lab and animal studies. It discusses "organ-on-a-chip" devices, small lab systems using human cells grown in 3D, as a possible better way to study how microplastics interact with the body.
Can the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on human health really be assessed using in vitro models? A review of methodological issues
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines whether lab-based cell studies can reliably predict how micro and nanoplastics affect human health. The authors found significant inconsistencies in how researchers choose plastic particle types, doses, and exposure methods, making it hard to compare results across studies. The paper calls for standardized testing protocols so that lab findings can more accurately reflect real-world microplastic exposure risks to people.
Human Exposure to Microplastics: Toxicological Mechanisms and Potential Health Implications - a Narrative Review
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles from our food, water, and air are showing up inside the human body, and lab studies suggest they could trigger cell damage, inflammation, and hormone disruption. This review pulls together existing research to show that while the potential risks are concerning, most evidence so far comes from test tubes and animal studies—so scientists still can't say for certain whether microplastics are directly causing specific diseases in people. More real-world human studies are needed before we know exactly how worried to be.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.