We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comments to "Degli-Innocenti, F. The pathology of hype, hyperbole and publication bias is creating an unwarranted concern towards biodegradable mulch films" [J. Hazard. Mater. 463 (2024) 132923].
AI summary Read the abstract
This commentary challenged industry claims that biodegradable mulch films are environmentally friendly, presenting evidence that they degrade incompletely in agricultural soils, leaving behind microplastic residues that can persist in the soil and affect soil health similarly to conventional plastics.
Some narratives present biodegradable plastic use for soil mulching practices in agriculture as "environmentally friendly" and "sustainable" alternatives to conventional plastics. To verify these narratives, environmental research recently started focusing on their potential impact on soil health, highlighting some concerns. The paper by Degli-Innocenti criticizes this unfolding knowledge arguing that it is affected by communication hypes, alarmistic writing and a focus on exposure scenarios purposedly crafted to yield negative effects. The quest of scientists for increased impact - the paper concludes - is the driver of such behavior. As scholars devoted to the safeguarding of scientific integrity, we set to verify whether this serious claim is grounded in evidence. Through a bibliometric analysis (using number of paper reads, citations and mentions on social media to measure the impact of publications) we found that: i) the papers pointed out by Degli-Innocenti as examples of biased works do not score higher than the median of similar publications; ii) the methodology used to support the conclusion is non-scientific; and iii) the paper does not fulfil the requirements concerning disclosure of conflicts of interests. We conclude that this paper represents a non-scientific opinion, potentially biased by a conflict of interest. We ask the paper to be clearly tagged as such, after the necessary corrections on the ethic section have been made. That being said, the paper does offer some useful insights for the definition of exposure scenarios in risk assessment. We comment and elaborate on these proposed models, hoping that this can help to advance the field.
More Papers Like This
The pathology of hype, hyperbole and publication bias is creating an unwarranted concern towards biodegradable mulch films
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper challenges the growing alarm around biodegradable mulch films by critically analyzing studies that report negative effects on soil. The authors argue that many of those studies used unrealistic experimental conditions, such as adding virgin plastic pieces at concentrations hundreds of times higher than actual field use. The study calls for more balanced research and cautions against letting publication bias drive premature conclusions about biodegradable agricultural films.
Are mulch biofilms used in agriculture an environmentally friendly solution? - An insight into their biodegradability and ecotoxicity using key organisms in soil ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed the biodegradation and ecotoxicity of a commercial biodegradable mulch biofilm in soil systems. The study found that while marketed as environmentally friendly alternatives to conventional plastic mulch, biodegradable films did not fully degrade under natural soil conditions as certification standards would predict. The results suggest that more rigorous testing under realistic field conditions is needed before assuming these products are safe for soil ecosystems.
A critical review of biodegradable plastic mulch films in agriculture: Definitions, scientific background and potential impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
"Biodegradable" plastic mulch films used by farmers are marketed as a green alternative to regular plastic sheeting, since they're meant to break down in soil instead of being removed and thrown away, but this review of existing research finds that they may not fully break down as promised, potentially leaving behind tiny plastic fragments and chemical additives in farmland soil. Because these residues could work their way into crops, water, and eventually our food supply, scientists say we still don't know enough about their long-term safety, and more real-world testing is needed before these products can be confidently called eco-friendly.
Biodegradable mulch films exhibit slower-than-expected degradation with negligible effects on soil microbial communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers ran a year-long field trial with seven biodegradable plastic mulch films in the UK, finding that none fragmented into soil microplastics as expected and all degraded far more slowly than current industry standards suggest they should. Despite virtually no measurable impact on soil microbial communities, the results challenge the assumption that biodegradable plastics reliably break down under real farming conditions.
The long-term uncertainty of biodegradable mulch film residues and associated microplastics pollution on plant-soil health
AI summary Read the abstract
This study investigated the long-term effects of biodegradable mulch film residues and their associated microplastics on soil health and plant growth. Researchers found that as biodegradable films break down faster than conventional plastics, they may actually generate more microplastics in a shorter timeframe. The results raise concerns that biodegradable mulch films, often promoted as eco-friendly alternatives, could pose their own risks to agricultural soil ecosystems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.