We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Assessment of biodegradation and toxicity of alternative plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate: Impacts on microbial biofilms, metabolism, and reactive oxygen species-mediated stress response.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed the biodegradation and toxicity of DOTP, a non-phthalate plasticizer increasingly used as a safer alternative, focusing on its effects on microbial biofilm communities. They found DOTP disrupted microbial metabolism and triggered reactive oxygen species-mediated stress, raising concerns about its environmental safety.
Although di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DOTP) is being widely adopted as a non-phthalate plasticizer, existing research primarily focuses on human and rat toxicity. This leaves a significant gap in our understanding of their impact on microbial communities. This study assessed the biodegradation and toxicity of DOTP on microbes, focusing on its impact on biofilms and microbial metabolism using Rhodococcus ruber as a representative bacterial strain. DOTP is commonly found in mass fractions between 0.6 and 20% v/v in various soft plastic products. This study used polyvinyl chloride films (PVC) with varying DOTP concentrations (range 1-10% v/v) as a surface for analysis of biofilm growth. Cell viability and bacterial stress responses were tested using LIVE/DEAD™ BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit and by the detection of reactive oxygen species using CellROX™ Green Reagent, respectively. An increase in the volume of dead cells (in the plastisphere biofilm) was observed with increasing DOTP concentrations in experiments using PVC films, indicating the potential negative impact of DOTP on microbial communities. Even at a relatively low concentration of DOTP (1%), signs of stress in the microbes were noticed, while concentrations above 5% compromised their ability to survive. This research provides a new understanding of the environmental impacts of alternative plasticizers, prompting the need for additional research into their wider effects on both the environment and human health.
More Papers Like This
Leaching of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate from biodegradable and conventional microplastics and the potential risks
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the leaching of the plasticizer DEHP from biodegradable and conventional microplastics into seawater. They found that conventional polyethylene mulch film released the most DEHP, at about six times the amount leached from biodegradable alternatives. The study suggests that while all tested microplastics released some DEHP, the pollution risk from the leached amounts was assessed as low based on phthalate pollution indices.
A progress update on the biological effects of biodegradable microplastics on soil and ocean environment: A perfect substitute or new threat?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines whether biodegradable plastics, often marketed as eco-friendly alternatives, actually break down safely in the environment. The evidence shows that biodegradable plastics often fragment into microplastics rather than fully decomposing, and these biodegradable microplastics can harm soil organisms, marine life, and disrupt nutrient cycles. The findings suggest that simply switching to biodegradable plastics may not solve the microplastic pollution problem and could introduce new environmental risks.
New advances to assess biodegradation and toxicity of alternative environmentally friendly polymers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed new methods to assess the biodegradation rates and ecotoxicity of alternative polymers including biobased, recycled, and biodegradable plastics, addressing a gap in risk assessment frameworks focused primarily on conventional plastics. Results showed biodegradability varied greatly by polymer type and environmental conditions, and alternative plastics still exhibited measurable toxicity during degradation.
Cross-feeding drives degradation of phthalate ester plasticizers in a bacterial consortium
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers characterized a three-member bacterial consortium capable of fully mineralizing the plasticizer diethyl phthalate as a sole carbon source, revealing through metaproteomic analysis that degradation relies on cross-feeding between Microbacterium and two Pseudomonas species, with each member contributing distinct enzymatic steps in a cooperative pathway.
Microbiology combined with metabonomics revealing the response of soil microorganisms and their metabolic functions exposed to phthalic acid esters
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined how common plastic plasticizers (phthalic acid esters) affect soil microorganisms and their metabolic functions using genomic sequencing and metabolomics. They found that while plasticizers did not significantly change bacterial diversity in the short term, they altered community structure and disrupted metabolic pathways, with dibutyl phthalate affecting 172 metabolites and 43 metabolic pathways. The study also identified certain soil bacteria with potential to degrade these plasticizer compounds.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.