0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Role of large-scale slip in mode II fracture of bimaterial interface produced by diffusion bonding

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 2001 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Matthew Fox, Ashok Ghosh

Summary

Mode II fracture studies on nickel-aluminium/molybdenum bimaterial interfaces showed that interface waviness and microplastic effects significantly influence crack initiation, and that microplastic deformation can be obscured in brittle testing conditions. Understanding crack initiation mechanisms at material interfaces is relevant to how polymer composites fragment at layer boundaries, generating microplastic debris.

Bimaterial interfaces present in diffusion-bonded (and in-situ) composites are often not flat interfaces. The unevenness of the interface can result not only from interface reaction products but also from long-range waviness associated with the surfaces of the component phases bonded together. Experimental studies aimed at determining interface mechanical properties generally ignore the departure in the local stress due to waviness and assume a theoretically flat interface. Furthermore, the commonly used testing methods involving superimposed tension often renders the interface so extremely brittle that if microplastic effects were present it becomes impossible to perceive them. This article examines the role of waviness of the interface and microplastic effects on crack initiation. To do this, a test was selected that provides significant stability against crack growth by superimposing compressive stresses. Mode II interface fracture was studied for NiAl/Mo model laminates using a recently developed asymmetrically loaded shear (ALS) interface shear test. The ALS test may be viewed as opposite of the laminate bend test. In the bend test, shear at the interface is created via tension on one surface of the bend, while in the ALS test, shear is created by compression on one side of the interface relative to the other. Normal to the interface, near the crack tip, an initially compressive state is replaced by slight tension due to Poisson’s expansion of the unbonded part of the compressed beam.

Share this paper