We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The impacts of polypropylene microplastics on carbon and nitrogen cycling in coastal wetlands: Field evidence
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a three-month in-situ field investigation of polypropylene microplastic effects on sediment carbon and nitrogen cycling in both intertidal and supratidal zones of a coastal wetland. They found that high concentrations (2% w/w) of polypropylene microplastics significantly stimulated carbon-degrading enzyme activity, while the effects on total organic carbon and nitrogen cycling showed concentration-dependent variation across wetland zones.
Coastal wetlands are hotspots for carbon and nitrogen cycling and serve as sinks for microplastics (MPs). Although MP effects on these biogeochemical cycles have been investigated under laboratory experiments, field-based evidence is lacking. This study presents the first field investigation of MP impacts, specifically polypropylene (PP), on sediment carbon and nitrogen cycling in intertidal and supratidal zones of a coastal wetland, employing in-situ culture over three months. Regarding carbon cycling, PP MPs exerted similar effects across zones and showed distinct concentration-dependent variations. 0.2 % (w/w) PP MPs had no significant effect on carbon cycling in either zone, whereas 2 % (w/w) PP MPs significantly stimulated carbon-degrading enzyme activity but did not affect total organic carbon content. For nitrogen cycling, the impact of PP MPs exhibited pronounced spatial heterogeneity. In the intertidal zone, both concentrations had no effect on ammonium and nitrate, whereas in the supratidal zone, they significantly altered inorganic nitrogen levels, with ammonium responses varying by MP concentration. Compared to existing laboratory findings, our field study suggests MP impacts on carbon and nitrogen cycling in coastal wetlands, particularly in the intertidal zone, are less pronounced. These findings provide a more practical understanding of the ecological impacts of MPs in coastal wetlands.
More Papers Like This
Effects of microplastics on carbon and nitrogen cycling in coastal wetlands: A critical meta-analysis
AI summary
This meta-analysis of over 1,000 data points from 34 studies found that microplastics significantly altered certain carbon and nitrogen cycling indicators in coastal wetlands under laboratory conditions, but tidal simulation experiments more representative of real environments showed no significant effects. The findings caution against over-interpreting lab results and highlight that tidal dynamics and vegetation factors are often missing from experimental designs.
Microplastics as pathway-selective modulators rewire nitrogen cycling in coastal wetlands: Polymer identity outweighs concentration
AI summary Read the abstract
Coastal wetlands act like natural water filters, using bacteria to remove excess nitrogen pollution before it causes harmful algae blooms in our oceans. This study found that certain plastics—especially polystyrene (like foam cups) and polypropylene (common in packaging)—can disrupt this filtering process, causing wetlands to trap nitrogen as ammonium instead of safely releasing it as gas. This matters because it means plastic pollution isn't just about visible litter or ingestion risks—it could be quietly weakening one of nature's key defenses against water pollution that affects seafood safety and coastal ecos
Effect of microplastics on CO2 emission from Yellow River Delta wetland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that microplastic contamination in Yellow River Delta wetland soils altered CO2 emissions, with different polymer types and concentrations producing varying effects on soil carbon dynamics — raising concern that plastic pollution could undermine the carbon sequestration function of coastal wetlands.
Non-negligible impact of microplastics on wetland ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines microplastic pollution in wetland ecosystems, which sit between land and water and act as natural filters. Microplastics in wetlands come from sewage, agricultural runoff, and atmospheric deposition, with polyethylene and polypropylene fibers and fragments being the most common types found. The paper highlights that microplastics can harm wetland plants, animals, and microbes, and may even increase greenhouse gas emissions by serving as an unusual carbon source for soil microorganisms.
Carbon Cycling in Wetlands Under the Shadow of Microplastics: Challenges and Prospects
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how microplastics disrupt carbon cycling in wetlands, which are critical ecosystems for capturing and storing carbon that would otherwise contribute to climate change. Microplastics can damage plant roots, alter soil microbial communities, and accelerate the breakdown of stored organic carbon, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions. The findings highlight that microplastic pollution may undermine wetlands' ability to help regulate the climate.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.