0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Fracture Toughness Determinations by Means of Indentation Fracture

InTech eBooks 2011 71 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Enrique Rocha‐Rangel

Summary

This engineering chapter describes the indentation fracture technique for measuring fracture toughness in brittle materials like ceramics and composites, reviewing mathematical models used for interpretation. This is a materials science study with no relevance to microplastic pollution or environmental health.

The assessment of fracture toughness (KIC) on fragile materials such as ceramics or composites through conventional methods can be arduous. Recently, an alternative route referred to as the Indentation Fracture technique has been widely accepted with this purpose and extensively reported in literature (Weisbrod & Rittel, 2000; Plaza, 2003; Evans & Charles, 1976; Niihara et al., 1982). Different authors have derived math equations series as to fine tune and match with KIC determination; those equations are based in the lineal mechanical fracture theory (Wang, 1996). The indentation fracture method and its application procedure are described in this chapter, whereas typical problems involved in the test are shown. Al2O3-based composites with different reinforced metals fabricated by both; liquid and solid pressureless sintering of an intensive mechanical mixture of powders were used as studied materials. Ceramic materials have properties of great interest for various structural applications, specifically those that take advantage of their high hardness, chemical and thermal stability in addition to their high stiffness. However, their great fragility has severely limited their applications, although they have developed ceramic with reinforcement materials precisely to increase the toughness of the same (Miranda et al., 2006; Konopka & Szafran, 2006; Marci & Katarzyna, 2007; Travirskya et al., 2003; Sglavo, 1997). One of the macroscopic properties that characterize the fragility of a ceramic is the fracture toughness (KIC). The fracture toughness describes the ease with which propagates a crack or defect in a material. This property can be assessed through various methods such as: Analytical solution, solution by numerical methods (finite element, boundary integral, etc.). Experimental methods such as: complianza, fotoelasticity, strain gauge, etc. and indirect methods such as: propagation of fatigue cracks, indentation, fractography, etc. The choice of method for determining the fracture toughness depends on the availability of time, resources and level of precision required for the application. In practice, measurements of KIC require certain microstructural conditions on the material to allow propagation of cracks through it in a consistent manner. The strength of materials is governed by the known theory of Griffith, which relates the strength (S) with the size of the defect or crack (c) by S = YKIC/c1/2. This expression suggests the need to reduce the grain size and processing defects in the final microstructure to optimize the mechanical performance. Moreover, with increasing KIC, resistance becomes less dependent on the size of the defect, thereby producing a more tolerant material to cracking. Due to high elastic modulus and low values of KIC in brittle materials, achieving in them a stable crack growth is complicated and sometimes it is necessary sophisticated

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of Fracture Toughness Measurements Using Chevron-Notched Silicon and Tungsten Microcantilevers

Researchers evaluated methods for measuring the fracture toughness of small samples of tungsten, a brittle material used in nuclear applications. This is a materials engineering study with no relevance to environmental microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Fracture toughness determination and micromechanics of rock under mode I and mode II loading

This thesis describes a new experimental method for measuring shear (Mode II) fracture toughness in rock, comparing it to tensile fracture testing. This rock mechanics study has no connection to microplastics or environmental health.

Article Tier 2

Brittle materials at high-loading rates: an open area of research

This paper reviews how brittle materials like ceramics, rocks, and concrete behave when subjected to high-speed impacts and explosive loading, identifying knowledge gaps in understanding their fracture behavior. This materials science study is focused on engineering and defense applications and has no direct relevance to microplastics research.

Article Tier 2

Atomistic Studies of Nanoindentation—A Review of Recent Advances

This review covers advances in using computer simulations to understand how materials deform at the nanoscale during nanoindentation testing. The research is in materials science and not directly related to environmental microplastics.

Article Tier 2

The Instrumented Indentation Test: An Aiding Tool for Material Science and Industry

This review examines instrumented indentation testing — a method for measuring the mechanical properties of materials by pressing a hard tip into their surface. The technique is useful for characterizing plastics, metals, and other engineering materials without destroying the sample.

Share this paper