0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Quality assessment of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): Comparison between commercial and wild types

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2014 761 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Bavo De Witte, Lisa Devriese, Karen Bekaert, S. Hoffman, Griet Vandermeersch, K. Cooreman, Johan Robbens

Summary

Researchers compared the quality of commercially farmed blue mussels to wild-caught individuals, assessing multiple quality indicators and finding differences in condition, contaminant load, and microplastic content between the two production sources.

This study compared species identity, microplastics, chemical and microbial contamination between consumption mussels and wild type mussels, collected at Belgian department stores and Belgian groynes and quaysides, respectively. Species identification based on genetic analysis showed a high number of Mytilus (M.) edulis compared to M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis/galloprovincialis hybrid mussels. The number of total microplastics varied from 2.6 to 5.1 fibres/10 g of mussel. A higher prevalence of orange fibres at quaysides is related to fisheries activities. Chemical contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorobiphenyls could be related to industrial activities and water turbidity, with maximum concentrations at the quayside of port Zeebrugge. The inverse was noted for Escherichia coli contamination, which was relatively low at Zeebrugge quayside with a total count of 3.9 × 10(2)CFU/100 g tissue, due to limited agricultural effluents. Results of this complementary analysis stress the importance of integrated monitoring and quality assessment.

Share this paper