Back to papers
0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Methodology Used for the Detection and Identification of Microplastics—A Critical Appraisal

2015 740 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder Gunnar Gerdts, Martin G. J. Löder

Summary

Researchers reviewed the wide variety of methods used to detect and count microplastics in environmental samples, finding that the lack of standardized protocols makes it nearly impossible to compare results across studies — a North Sea case study using advanced infrared spectroscopy found that only 1.4% of particles that visually appeared to be microplastics were actually synthetic polymers. The review emphasizes that reliable microplastic data urgently requires agreed-upon analytical standards.

Microplastics in aquatic ecosystems and especially in the marine environment represent a pollution of increasing scientific and societal concern, thus, recently a substantial number of studies on microplastics were published. Although first steps towards a standardization of methodologies used for the detection and identification of microplastics in environmental samples are made, the comparability of data on microplastics is currently hampered by a huge variety of different methodologies, which result in the generation of data of extremely different quality and resolution. This chapter reviews the methodology presently used for assessing the concentration of microplastics in the marine environment with a focus on the most convenient techniques and approaches. After an overview of non-selective sampling approaches, sample processing and treatment in the laboratory, the reader is introduced to the currently applied techniques for the identification and quantification of microplastics. The subsequent case study on microplastics in sediment samples from the North Sea measured with focal plane array (FPA)-based micro-Fourier transform infrared (micro-FTIR) spectroscopy shows that only 1.4 % of the particles visually resembling microplastics were of synthetic polymer origin. This finding emphasizes the importance of verifying the synthetic polymer origin of potential microplastics. Thus, a burning issue concerning current microplastic research is the generation of standards that allow for the assessment of reliable data on concentrations of microscopic plastic particles and the involved polymers with analytical laboratory techniques such as micro-FTIR or micro-Raman spectroscopy.

Read via DOI Download PDF

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email