0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Using a forensic science approach to minimize environmental contamination and to identify microfibres in marine sediments

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2015 310 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper argued for applying forensic science standards — including rigorous chain of custody and contamination controls — to microplastic sampling and analysis to reduce false positives from lab contamination. The study found that microfibers, which are ubiquitous in lab air, are particularly likely to contaminate samples unless strict protocols are followed.

There is growing evidence of extensive pollution of the environment by microplastic, with microfibres representing a large proportion of the microplastics seen in marine sediments. Since microfibres are ubiquitous in the environment, present in the laboratory air and water, evaluating microplastic pollution is difficult. Incidental contamination is highly likely unless strict control measures are employed. Here we describe methods developed to minimize the amount of incidental post-sampling contamination when quantifying marine microfibre pollution. We show that our protocol, adapted from the field of forensic fibre examination, reduces fibre abundance by 90% and enables the quick screening of fibre populations. These methods therefore allow an accurate estimate of microplastics polluting marine sediments. In a case study from a series of samples collected on a research vessel, we use these methods to highlight the prevalence of microfibres as marine microplastics.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Prioritizing Suitable Quality Assurance and Control Standards to Reduce Laboratory Airborne Microfibre Contamination in Sediment Samples

AI summary Read the abstract

Airborne microfibers from the laboratory environment can contaminate samples during microplastic analysis, leading to inflated counts. This study evaluated contamination control measures and recommends specific quality assurance standards to improve data reliability.

Article Tier 2

Assuring quality in microplastic monitoring: About the value of clean-air devices as essentials for verified data

AI summary Read the abstract

This study developed a practical method for quantifying background microfiber contamination introduced during laboratory sample processing, arguing that clean-air devices and contamination controls are essential for reliable microplastic analysis. Without accounting for lab-introduced fibers, environmental contamination levels can be significantly overestimated.

Article Tier 2

Are we contaminating our samples? A preliminary study to investigate procedural contamination during field sampling and processing for microplastic and anthropogenic microparticles

AI summary Read the abstract

A pilot study investigated procedural contamination during field sampling and laboratory processing of water samples for microplastics, finding that synthetic clothing and air exposure during processing introduced measurable levels of synthetic fibers into samples, arguing for standardized contamination controls.

Review Tier 2

Cross-Contamination as a Problem in Collection and Analysis of Environmental Samples Containing Microplastics—A Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines cross-contamination as a systematic problem in microplastic research, finding that synthetic fibers from clothing, laboratory plastics, and airborne particles can contaminate samples during collection and analysis, and reviewing methods to minimize and account for procedural contamination.

Article Tier 2

Potential sources of microplastic contamination in laboratory analysis and a protocol for minimising contamination

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists identified multiple sources of microplastic contamination that can be accidentally introduced during laboratory analysis of biological samples, including from lab water, chemicals, and air. By filtering reagents, pre-treating glass fiber filters, and using a clean working environment, they reduced lab-introduced contamination by 70–100%. These findings are important for accurate microplastic research: without such precautions, studies can significantly overestimate how much plastic is actually present in animal tissues or environmental samples.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper