0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Do wastewater treatment plants act as a potential point source of microplastics? Preliminary study in the coastal Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea

Water Science & Technology 2015 492 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Anna Mikola, Julia Talvitie, Anna Mikola, Mari Heinonen, Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Jari-Pekka Pääkkönen, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Jari-Pekka Pääkkönen, Julia Talvitie, Anna Mikola, Outi Setälä Mari Heinonen, Mari Heinonen, Emil Vahtera, Outi Setälä Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Outi Setälä Anna Mikola, Outi Setälä Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Anna Mikola, Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Riku Vahala, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Riku Vahala, Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Riku Vahala, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Outi Setälä Outi Setälä

Summary

A study at a Finnish wastewater treatment plant found that although influent microplastic concentrations were high, treatment processes removed the vast majority — but a meaningful fraction still passed through in the effluent. The results confirm that even well-run treatment plants cannot fully prevent microplastic discharge to receiving water bodies.

Study Type Environmental

This study on the removal of microplastics during different wastewater treatment unit processes was carried out at Viikinmäki wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The amount of microplastics in the influent was high, but it decreased significantly during the treatment process. The major part of the fibres were removed already in primary sedimentation whereas synthetic particles settled mostly in secondary sedimentation. Biological filtration further improved the removal. A proportion of the microplastic load also passed the treatment and was found in the effluent, entering the receiving water body. After the treatment process, an average of 4.9 (±1.4) fibres and 8.6 (±2.5) particles were found per litre of wastewater. The total textile fibre concentration in the samples collected from the surface waters in the Helsinki archipelago varied between 0.01 and 0.65 fibres per litre, while the synthetic particle concentration varied between 0.5 and 9.4 particles per litre. The average fibre concentration was 25 times higher and the particle concentration was three times higher in the effluent compared to the receiving body of water. This indicates that WWTPs may operate as a route for microplastics entering the sea.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper