0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Electron Beam Induced Artifacts During in situ TEM Deformation of Nanostructured Metals

Scientific Reports 2015 58 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rohit Sarkar, Christian Rentenberger, Jagannathan Rajagopalan Rohit Sarkar, Jagannathan Rajagopalan Christian Rentenberger, Christian Rentenberger, Jagannathan Rajagopalan

Summary

This study examined how electron beam exposure during in situ transmission electron microscopy causes dislocation activation and stress relaxation in aluminum and gold nanoscale films, revealing a methodological artifact that can distort results. While focused on materials science, the findings caution researchers to account for beam-induced changes when interpreting nanoscale deformation experiments.

A critical assumption underlying in situ transmission electron microscopy studies is that the electron beam (e-beam) exposure does not fundamentally alter the intrinsic deformation behavior of the materials being probed. Here, we show that e-beam exposure causes increased dislocation activation and marked stress relaxation in aluminum and gold films spanning a range of thicknesses (80-400 nanometers) and grain sizes (50-220 nanometers). Furthermore, the e-beam induces anomalous sample necking, which unusually depends more on the e-beam diameter than intensity. Notably, the stress relaxation in both aluminum and gold occurs at beam energies well below their damage thresholds. More remarkably, the stress relaxation and/or sample necking is significantly more pronounced at lower accelerating voltages (120 kV versus 200 kV) in both the metals. These observations in aluminum and gold, two metals with highly dissimilar atomic weights and properties, indicate that e-beam exposure can cause anomalous behavior in a broad spectrum of nanostructured materials, and simultaneously suggest a strategy to minimize such artifacts.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper