0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

First ecotoxicological investigation in whale sharks of the Gulf of California (Mexico) using skin biopsy

2016 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, Matteo Baini, Letizia Marsili, María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, Begoña Jiménez, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Begoña Jiménez, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Letizia Marsili, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Dení Ramírez‐Macías, María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi Begoña Jiménez, Begoña Jiménez, Begoña Jiménez, Begoña Jiménez, Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi Begoña Jiménez, María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Letizia Marsili, María Cristina Fossi Juan Munoz Arnaz, Letizia Marsili, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Juan Munoz Arnaz, Cristina Panti, Dení Ramírez‐Macías, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Dení Ramírez‐Macías, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Letizia Marsili, María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Matteo Baini, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi Cristina Panti, Matteo Baini, Cristina Panti, María Cristina Fossi María Cristina Fossi

Summary

This study conducted the first ecotoxicological assessment of whale sharks in the Gulf of California using skin biopsies, examining pollutant burdens in this protected species. Whale sharks face growing threats from chemical pollution as human activity expands in their habitats, and this baseline data can help inform conservation management.

Body Systems

Background The impact that pollutants have on whale sharks ( Rhincodon typus ) is a question that remains largely unexplored. Whale sharks (WSs) are known to aggregate seasonally in different areas in the Gulf of California. Although this species is protected in Mexico since 2001, habitats for most of these aggregations are not protected. Out of the 7 localities were they aggregate, 3 are protected whereas the other 4 need to have some protection. Urban and touristic developments are major threats to their habitats because they lead to mangrove and estuary damage, both being important areas for their food resources. Moreover, due to poor fishery regulations, whale sharks often die as by-catch in fishing nets. The growth of tourism in the area of La Paz and Los Cabos represents an increase in maritime traffic and, thereby an increase in the number of collisions of WSs with boats. Finally, the increasing human activity in WS grounds is the cause of chemical pollution from urban waste waters, vessels, agriculture and solid waste (it is common to see WSs feeding while surrounded by marine litter). Approach In this work, we perform the first ecotoxicological investigation, using skin biopsy, of whale sharks sampled in the Gulf of California. In order to evaluate the potential impact of anthropogenic activities on this species, 13 skin biopsy samples were collected in January 2014 from 12 males and 1 female whale shark in La Paz Bay. PCBs (twenty-one ortho PCB congeners), DDTs (six o,p '- and p,p '- DDE, DDD and DDT isomers), PBDEs (fourteen congeners from tri- to deca-substituted) and HCB were analyzed on freeze-dried blubber biopsy samples by GC-qMS. Biomarker responses (cytochrome P450 1A, CYP1A1) were detected, using western-blotting (WB) techniques, in integument biopsies (skin tissue samples) of this vulnerable (IUCN) species. Semi-quantitative analysis was performed for each WB using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, 1-D Analysis Software). Results The average abundance pattern for the target contaminants was PCBs >DDTs > PBDEs >HCB. Mean concentration values (and ranges) of 8.42 (0.720–41.40) ng/g w.w. were found for PCBs, 1.31 (0.20–6.36) ng/g w.w. for DDTs, 0.294 (0.02–1.14) ng/g w.w. for PBDEs and finally 0.192 (0.01–0.66) for HCB. The detected values are lower than in other planktivorous shark species (e.g. basking shark) in other areas (e.g. Mediterranean Sea). Cytochrome P450 1A (CYP1A1) was also detected for the first time, using western-blotting techniques, in the skin samples of this species. The potential impact of microplastic (plastic fragments smaller than 5 mm) and related contaminants (such as plastic additives) has also been explored in this large filter feeding species. Preliminary data on the average density of microplastics in the superficial zooplankton/microplastic samples collected from the Sea of Cortez (La Paz Bay) showed that the values ranged from 0.00 items/m3 to 0.14 items/m3; furthermore, concentrations of mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), used as a tracer of plastic additives, ranged from 13.08 ng/g to 13.69 ng/g. Conclusions Further ecotoxicological investigation on whale shark skin biopsies will be carried out in order to support the idea of the usefulness of non-lethal approaches in the worldwide ecotoxicological risk assessment of this vulnerable species.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper