0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Harnessing Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Laser‐Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Data Analysis: A Comprehensive Review

Analysis & Sensing 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 43 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Pegah Dehbozorgi, Ludovic Duponchel, Ludovic Duponchel, Vincent Motto‐Ros, Thomas Bocklitz Thomas Bocklitz

Summary

Machine learning and deep learning approaches were reviewed for their applications in detecting, classifying, and quantifying microplastics in environmental and biological samples. The review highlights how AI is transforming the speed and scale of microplastic analysis, enabling large-scale monitoring programs.

Body Systems

Laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a rapid, accurate technique for material analysis, offering real‐time, minimally destructive, and in situ detection capabilities with broad application potential. LIBS extends its applications across various fields, from geology to biomedicine. However, barriers like matrix effects, reproducibility, self‐absorption, and spectral noise often restrict the proper interpretation of the spectra. This review paper examines literature from 2015 to 2025, focusing on the evolution of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques, in LIBS analysis. It evaluates the advancement of these techniques, assessing both the qualitative and quantitative performance of LIBS analysis. These observations support the complementary roles of ML and DL methodologies. ML captures general patterns, while DL, through convolutional neural networks (CNNs), excels at identifying high‐level features. This literature review reveals that no single ML or DL tool consistently provides optimal solutions for LIBS applications. The analysis pipeline needs to be tailored based on the LIBS data and the goal of the study. Designing such a framework requires the incorporation of preprocessing techniques to enhance the quality of raw signals. This step should then be followed by integrating the data into predictive models, whether ML or DL, to accomplish tasks like classification or concentration prediction.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper