0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water

Chemosphere 2016 412 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Shirin Estahbanati, Shirin Estahbanati, Shirin Estahbanati, Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld Nicole Fahrenfeld

Summary

This study measured microplastic concentrations upstream and downstream of wastewater treatment plant discharges in a freshwater river and found elevated concentrations below discharge points. The findings confirm that wastewater treatment plants, even when functioning properly, act as point sources of microplastic pollution to freshwater systems.

Study Type Environmental

The abundance of microplastic particles in the marine environment is well documented, but less is known about microplastics in the freshwater environment. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) may not effectively remove microplastics allowing for their release to the freshwater environment. To investigate concentration of microplastic in fresh water and the impact of WWTP effluent, samples were collected upstream and downstream of four major municipal WWTPs on the Raritan River, NJ. Microplastics were categorized into three quantitative categories (500-2000 μm, 250-500 μm, 125-250 μm), and one semi-quantitative category (63-125 μm). Then, microplastics were classified as primary (manufactured in small size) or secondary (derived from larger plastics) based on morphology. The concentration of microplastics in the 125-250 and 250-500 μm size categories significantly increased downstream of WWTP. The smaller size classes, often not quantified in microplastic studies, were in high relative abundance across sampling sites. While primary microplastics significantly increased downstream of WWTP, secondary microplastic was the dominant type in the quantitative size categories (66-88%). A moderate correlation between microplastic and distance downstream was observed. These results have implications for understanding the fate and transport of microplastics in the freshwater environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper