0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Toxic effects of microplastic on marine microalgae Skeletonema costatum: Interactions between microplastic and algae

Environmental Pollution 2016 823 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Cai Zhang, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Liju Tan, Cai Zhang, Xiaohua Chen, Liju Tan, Jiangtao Wang Liju Tan, Jiangtao Wang Liju Tan, Jiangtao Wang Liju Tan, Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Liju Tan, Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Liju Tan, Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang Jiangtao Wang

Summary

Researchers found that micrometer-sized PVC microplastics significantly inhibit the growth and photosynthesis of the marine microalga Skeletonema costatum — reaching up to 39.7% growth inhibition — primarily through direct physical adsorption and aggregation between particles and algal cells rather than by shading effects alone.

To investigate toxic effects of microplastic on marine microalgae Skeletonema costatum, both algal growth inhibition test and non-contact shading test were carried out, and algal photosynthesis parameters were also determined. The SEM images were used to observe interactions between microplastic and algae. It was found that microplastic (mPVC, average diameter 1 μm) had obvious inhibition on growth of microalgae and the maximum growth inhibition ratio (IR) reached up to 39.7% after 96 h exposure. However, plastic debris (bPVC, average diameter 1 mm) had no effects on growth of microalgae. High concentration (50 mg/L) mPVC also had negative effects on algal photosynthesis since both chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency (ΦPSⅡ) decreased under mPVC treatments. Shading effect was not one reason for toxicity of microplastic on algae in this study. Compared with non-contact shading effect, interactions between microplastic and microalage such as adsorption and aggregation were more reasonable explanations for toxic effects of microplastic on marine microalgae. The SEM images provided a more direct and reasonable method to observe the behaviors of microplastic.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper