0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Jämförelse av alternativa fyllnadsmaterial till konstgräsplaner

AI summary Read the abstract

This study evaluated and compared multiple alternative infill materials for artificial football pitches to address the environmental impact of rubber infill, which has been identified as Sweden's second largest source of microplastic emissions. Analysis including GC-MS and XRF testing found that at least three alternatives (Envirofill, Safeshell, and Geofill) were more environmentally friendly, equal in play performance, and comparable in cost to EPDM rubber infill.

The use of artificial football pitches have expanded rapidly in recent years due to its substantial benefits over natural grass fields. Increased playing hours and decreased maintenance costs are often cited as the main benefits, but to achieve necessary performance rubber infill material is used. The environmental impact of this rubber infill has been studied, the migration of rubber infill granules was determined as Swedens second largest source of microplastic emissions (Magnusson K. et al, 2015). To circumvent the problems caused by rubber infill, alternative infill materials has been considered as a solution. This study aims to evaluate and compare several alternative infill materials already present on the market. The comparison is based on ten separate criteria. To gather the information needed for evaluation contact has been made with producers and industry experts, coupled with GC-MS and XRF analysis of three materials included in the comparison. The results found that at least three different alternative infill materials were more environmentally friendly, equal in play performance and comparable economically to EPDM rubber infill: Envirofill (Acrylic-coated sand), Safeshell (Walnut) and Geofill (Coconut-cork mix).

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Gummigranulat på konstgräsplaner - en miljörisk till följd av spridning via dagvattensystemet.

AI summary Read the abstract

This Swedish study examines how rubber granulate from artificial turf football fields is released into the environment through stormwater runoff, and discusses the growing environmental concern as synthetic turf installations increase across Sweden. The report evaluates the scale of microplastic pollution from this widespread source.

Article Tier 2

Quantifying the Sustainability of Football (Soccer) Pitches: A Comparison of Artificial and Natural Turf Pitches with a Focus on Microplastics and Their Environmental Impacts

AI summary Read the abstract

A comparative life cycle assessment of artificial turf and natural grass football pitches found that artificial turf generates substantial microplastic emissions, particularly from rubber crumb infill, with total environmental impacts differing by metric.

Article Tier 2

Spridningen av gummigranulat från konstgräsplaner. - En undersökning av Aggarpsvallen i Svedala kommun

AI summary Read the abstract

This Swedish investigation quantified the spread of rubber granulate infill from two artificial football fields in Svedala municipality, measuring how these tire-derived microplastics disperse into surrounding soils and waterways — important given that artificial turf is identified as Sweden's second-largest microplastic source.

Article Tier 2

Fate of recycled tyre granulate used on artificial turf

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the environmental fate of recycled tyre rubber granulate used as infill on artificial turf fields, finding that while the material provides significant CO2 savings compared to alternatives, dispersal of approximately 3,000-5,000 kg per field per year to surrounding environments raises microplastic pollution concerns.

Article Tier 2

The Athlete's Invisible Opponent: Synthetic Turf Risks in Sustainable Stadiums and Green Chemistry Solutions

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examined the health and environmental risks posed by styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) infill granules in third-generation synthetic sports pitches. The authors found that athletes are exposed to microplastics and carcinogenic compounds from rubber crumb, and reviewed green chemistry alternatives that could replace conventional infill while maintaining pitch performance.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper