0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastic Exposure Assessment in Aquatic Environments: Learning from Similarities and Differences to Engineered Nanoparticles

Environmental Science & Technology 2017 211 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Frank von der Kammer, Antonia Praetorius Stephan Wagner, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Antonia Praetorius Thilo Hofmann, Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Thilo Hofmann, Antonia Praetorius Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Frank von der Kammer, Antonia Praetorius Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Antonia Praetorius Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Stephan Wagner, Frank von der Kammer, Stephan Wagner, Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Stephan Wagner, Stephan Wagner, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Frank von der Kammer, Thilo Hofmann, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Stephan Wagner, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Antonia Praetorius Thorsten Hüffer, Antonia Praetorius Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Antonia Praetorius Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Stephan Wagner, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Stephan Wagner, Antonia Praetorius Thorsten Hüffer, Stephan Wagner, Stephan Wagner, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Frank von der Kammer, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Thorsten Hüffer, Stephan Wagner, Stephan Wagner, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Thilo Hofmann, Stephan Wagner, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Antonia Praetorius Thilo Hofmann, Antonia Praetorius Antonia Praetorius

Summary

Researchers reviewed the parallels between microplastic exposure assessment and engineered nanoparticle research in aquatic environments. The study suggests that established methods from nanoparticle science could help address key gaps in microplastic risk assessment, including emission quantification, fate processes, and analytical monitoring techniques.

Microplastics (MPs) have been identified as contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic environments and research into their behavior and fate has been sharply increasing in recent years. Nevertheless, significant gaps remain in our understanding of several crucial aspects of MP exposure and risk assessment, including the quantification of emissions, dominant fate processes, types of analytical tools required for characterization and monitoring, and adequate laboratory protocols for analysis and hazard testing. This Feature aims at identifying transferrable knowledge and experience from engineered nanoparticle (ENP) exposure assessment. This is achieved by comparing ENP and MPs based on their similarities as particulate contaminants, whereas critically discussing specific differences. We also highlight the most pressing research priorities to support an efficient development of tools and methods for MPs environmental risk assessment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper