Microplastic Exposure Assessment in Aquatic Environments: Learning from Similarities and Differences to Engineered Nanoparticles
Environmental Science & Technology2017
211 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 55
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Frank von der Kammer,
Antonia Praetorius
Stephan Wagner,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Antonia Praetorius
Thilo Hofmann,
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Thilo Hofmann,
Antonia Praetorius
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Frank von der Kammer,
Antonia Praetorius
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Antonia Praetorius
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Stephan Wagner,
Frank von der Kammer,
Stephan Wagner,
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Stephan Wagner,
Stephan Wagner,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Frank von der Kammer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Stephan Wagner,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Antonia Praetorius
Thorsten Hüffer,
Antonia Praetorius
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Antonia Praetorius
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Stephan Wagner,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Stephan Wagner,
Antonia Praetorius
Thorsten Hüffer,
Stephan Wagner,
Stephan Wagner,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Frank von der Kammer,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Stephan Wagner,
Stephan Wagner,
Thorsten Hüffer,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Thilo Hofmann,
Stephan Wagner,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Frank von der Kammer,
Antonia Praetorius
Thilo Hofmann,
Antonia Praetorius
Antonia Praetorius
Summary
Researchers reviewed the parallels between microplastic exposure assessment and engineered nanoparticle research in aquatic environments. The study suggests that established methods from nanoparticle science could help address key gaps in microplastic risk assessment, including emission quantification, fate processes, and analytical monitoring techniques.
Microplastics (MPs) have been identified as contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic environments and research into their behavior and fate has been sharply increasing in recent years. Nevertheless, significant gaps remain in our understanding of several crucial aspects of MP exposure and risk assessment, including the quantification of emissions, dominant fate processes, types of analytical tools required for characterization and monitoring, and adequate laboratory protocols for analysis and hazard testing. This Feature aims at identifying transferrable knowledge and experience from engineered nanoparticle (ENP) exposure assessment. This is achieved by comparing ENP and MPs based on their similarities as particulate contaminants, whereas critically discussing specific differences. We also highlight the most pressing research priorities to support an efficient development of tools and methods for MPs environmental risk assessment.