0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Addressing the Issue of Microplastics in the Wake of the Microbead-Free Waters Act—A New Standard Can Facilitate Improved Policy

Environmental Science & Technology 2017 221 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Jason P. McDevitt, Craig S. Criddle, Molly Morse, Molly Morse, Robert C. Hale, Charles Bott, Chelsea M. Rochman

Summary

Researchers reviewed the U.S. Microbead-Free Waters Act and its limitations, noting that while it eliminated one source of microplastic pollution, it was criticized for its narrow scope and for discouraging biodegradable alternatives. They propose a framework called "Ecocyclable" that could serve as a standard for evaluating whether microplastics are environmentally safe based on their degradation properties. The study suggests that better-defined standards would enable more effective and nuanced regulation of microplastic pollution.

The United States Microbead-Free Waters Act was signed into law in December 2015. It is a bipartisan agreement that will eliminate one preventable source of microplastic pollution in the United States. Still, the bill is criticized for being too limited in scope, and also for discouraging the development of biodegradable alternatives that ultimately are needed to solve the bigger issue of plastics in the environment. Due to a lack of an acknowledged, appropriate standard for environmentally safe microplastics, the bill banned all plastic microbeads in selected cosmetic products. Here, we review the history of the legislation and how it relates to the issue of microplastic pollution in general, and we suggest a framework for a standard (which we call "Ecocyclable") that includes relative requirements related to toxicity, bioaccumulation, and degradation/assimilation into the natural carbon cycle. We suggest that such a standard will facilitate future regulation and legislation to reduce pollution while also encouraging innovation of sustainable technologies.

Share this paper