0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Recovering microplastics from marine samples: A review of current practices

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2017 254 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Cherie A. Motti Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti

Summary

This review compared the published methods for separating and identifying microplastics from seawater, sediment, and marine organisms, assessing their efficiency, processing time, and potential to damage particles. It highlights the lack of standardized protocols as a major barrier to comparing results across studies.

Study Type Environmental

An important component of microplastic research is development of reproducible methods for microplastic recovery and characterization. Presented is a review of the literature comparing microplastic separation and identification methodologies from seawater, sediment and marine organisms. The efficiency of methods was examined, including processing time, recovery rates, and potential destruction of microplastics. Visual examination and acid digestion were the most common separation methods for seawater samples and organisms, while density flotation was the primary method for sediment. Few studies reported recovery rates, or investigated the physical or chemical impact on plastics. This knowledge gap may lead to misidentification of plastic or unreliable pollution estimates. Further investigation of the impact chemical treatments have on plastic is warranted. Factors, i.e. biomass loading, recovery rates, and chemical compatibility, must be considered to allow for appropriate methodology. Standardizing this will contribute to efficient sample processing, and allow for direct comparison of microplastic contamination across environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper