0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Rocky shoreline protocols miss microplastics in marine debris surveys (Fogo Island, Newfoundland and Labrador)

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2017 31 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study amended a standardized marine debris survey protocol for rocky shorelines, finding that standard sandy-beach methods underestimate litter on cobble beaches because plastics become buried under rocks. The findings highlight the need for habitat-specific monitoring protocols to accurately assess plastic contamination in diverse coastal environments.

Study Type Environmental

Most anthropogenic marine debris shoreline studies are conducted on sandy shores, rather than rocky coastlines. We amended a standardized protocol for monitoring marine debris on a high-loading beach composed of small rocks and cobbles in Newfoundland, Canada. Our protocol had two parts: we conducted stratified sampling to a depth of ~20cm below the surface of the rocks (standing survey), and surveyed accumulation of items on the surface of rocks every other day (loading survey). We found the vast majority of smaller items were below the surface. Only 17.2% of debris were microplastics (<5mm). Types of anthropogenic debris differed significantly between the standing survey and the loading survey. We found no relationship between either wind direction or wind speed, and distributions of debris. This study allows for a better understanding of marine debris detection along rocky coasts, and the limitations of protocols for studying them.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

How we count counts: Examining influences on detection during shoreline surveys of marine debris

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted field experiments to measure how accurately volunteers detect marine debris during shoreline surveys, finding that detection rates varied based on distance from the observer, debris color and size, and the type of shoreline surface. The study warns that inconsistent survey protocols make it difficult to compare debris data across studies and calls for more standardized monitoring approaches.

Article Tier 2

The Method of Studying Microplastics Pollution in the Beach and Bottom Sediments of Different Granulometric Composition

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper presents a method for studying microplastic pollution on beaches, describing a field sampling and laboratory analysis protocol for characterizing plastic particles in beach sediments. Standardized beach monitoring methods are essential for generating comparable data across different coastal locations.

Article Tier 2

Method for Quantifying and Characterization of Microplastics in Sand Beaches

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper proposes a standardized method for sampling and characterizing microplastics in beach sand to improve comparability across studies. Consistent methodology is critical because current variation in field and lab techniques makes it difficult to combine or compare data from different research groups.

Article Tier 2

Quantifying microplastic pollution on sandy beaches: the conundrum of large sample variability and spatial heterogeneity

AI summary Read the abstract

This methodological study tested different sampling approaches for measuring microplastic pellets on sandy beaches and found that concentrations vary greatly over small spatial distances, making single samples unreliable. The authors recommend specific multi-sample strategies to get accurate estimates of beach microplastic contamination.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Microplastic pollution characteristics in global marine sediments: A meta-analysis.

AI summary Read the abstract

This review combined data from many studies on microplastics in ocean floor sediments worldwide, finding amounts varied widely, with most pieces smaller than 1 millimeter. The analysis found differences in testing methods, rather than location, explained most of the variation between studies, highlighting a need for standardized measurement approaches.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper