0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Inter-instrument definition of valid criteria for the automatic identification of microplastics by micro-Raman spectroscopy

Talanta 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Rafaela Fernandes, Paul‐Tiberiu Miclea, Maria Elisabetta Fadda, Mara Putzu, Alessio Sacco, Andrea Mario Rossi, Andrea Mario Giovannozzi, M Barbaresi, Matteo Masino, Monica Mattarozzi, Maria Careri, Carla Palma, José Miguel Almeida, Claudia Drago, Olivier Pellegrino, Raquel Quendera, Braun, Ulrike, Bettencourt da Silva, Ricardo

Summary

Researchers developed a standardized methodology for automatically identifying microplastics using micro-Raman spectroscopy across different laboratory instruments. They determined optimal match algorithms and threshold values that achieved a 95% true positive rate with minimal false positives, even when spectra were collected on different spectrometers. The study addresses a key barrier to reliable, reproducible microplastic identification in environmental and health research.

Polymers

The assessment of the impact of microplastic contamination on the environment and human health requires a reliable identification of the polymer type of these particles. μ-Raman spectroscopy is a popular technique for identifying microplastics by comparing the reference spectra with those of the particles analysed. Automatic identification of microplastics requires defining an algorithm for the match between these spectra and setting a minimum match above which identification is performed with adequately high true and low false results rates. Ideally, the algorithm and match threshold should apply to different spectrometers and spectra collection parameters. This research presents a methodology to determine the best match algorithm for polymer identification using μ-Raman spectroscopy data collected on different instruments and laboratories, associated with a true positive rate (TP) of 95 % and a false positive rate (FP) lower than 5 %. Determining the match threshold (P5»P) by the bootstrap method does not require assumptions regarding match distribution. The normal distribution of the match between the reference and a particle's spectra from a different material allows FP determination. Identifying PET microparticles was optimal using Pearson's correlation coefficient (P5»P = 0.6244, TP = 95 %, FP = 4.9 × 10 %). Identification quality was tested based on three unweighted and three weighted correlation coefficients. Spectra with signal-to-noise ratios lower than 10 were forwarded to manual identifications. The MS Excel files used in the research are available as supporting information. The developed methodology for setting up identification criteria of microplastics by spectroscopy proved to be adequate for μ-Raman assessments and robust to different spectrometers and spectra collection conditions.

Share this paper