0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Reining in plasticulture from land to sea: Pacific Northwest (USA) perspectives on agriculture and aquaculture

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Lauren Kashiwabara, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Sebastian L. Singleton, Elise F. Granek, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Elise F. Granek, Lauren Kashiwabara, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Lauren Kashiwabara, Susanne M. Brander Lauren Kashiwabara, Susanne M. Brander Elise F. Granek, Gail Langellotto, Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Minal Mistry, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Lauren Kashiwabara, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Lauren Kashiwabara, Gifty Rhodalyn Tetteh, Elise F. Granek, Sebastian L. Singleton, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Elise F. Granek, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander MacKenna A. Hainey, Elise F. Granek, MacKenna A. Hainey, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Elise F. Granek, Lauren Kashiwabara, Stacey L. Harper, Lauren Kashiwabara, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Kirstin M. Arthur, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Kirstin M. Arthur, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Elise F. Granek, Elise F. Granek, Susanne M. Brander Karen Baird, Karen Baird, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Ricardo Palazuelos, Ricardo Palazuelos, N. B. M. Campos, Elise F. Granek, N. B. M. Campos, Heather Trim, Heather Trim, Lea Sommer, Lea Sommer, Susanne M. Brander Stacey L. Harper, Gifty Rhodalyn Tetteh, Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander Susanne M. Brander

Summary

This review examines the history and environmental consequences of plasticulture—the use of plastics in agriculture and aquaculture—in the Pacific Northwest, documenting how plastic mulch films, nets, and equipment release microplastics and chemical additives into soil, water, and food. It discusses policy gaps and advocates for reduced plastic use across food production sectors.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic use in food production—known as plasticulture—has transformed agriculture and aquaculture globally. Plasticulture gained momentum in the mid-20th century with the development of novel plastic materials, and by 2009, U.S. farmers used over 200 million pounds of plastic films annually. Though plastics have increased yields and efficiency, they now pose environmental hazards through the release of microplastics (MPs) and chemicals. Despite extensive documentation of MPs in the environment, their role in U.S. food production and impacts on crop, livestock, and aquaculture health remain underexplored. In regions like the Pacific Northwest (PNW), with robust agricultural and aquaculture sectors, plastics from films, mulches, cages, and ropes are significant sources of MPs. Soil amendments like biosolids and compost also contribute MPs from household waste. Agricultural plastics accounted for 3–5% (10–18 million tons) of global plastic production in 2018 and are projected to increase due to growing food demand. Aquaculture uses an estimated 2.1 million tons of plastics annually, but detailed data on MP generation is lacking. Despite known environmental concerns, a sustainable circular model for plastics in food systems is still absent, but necessary. While biodegradable products for use in farming and aquaculture have been introduced, high costs, regulations, and practical limitations hinder widespread adoption. Until recently, the American Society for Plasticulture (ASP) primarily focused on new plastic innovations rather than sustainability. Now, growing awareness of plastic pollution and health risks has led to increased scrutiny. In the PNW—home to key specialty crops and 6% of U.S. aquaculture operations—there is an urgent need for coordinated efforts to reduce plastic contamination. Shifting toward sustainable practices is challenging but critical to protect ecosystems, food safety, and public health, and possible through regional and state-level regulations on composting, wastewater and biosolids mitigation, and movement to more sustainable replacements where feasible. As our knowledge of micro and nanoplastic impacts on the food supply at sea and on land increases, approaches to reduce the use of plastics overall and to limit leaching and fragmentation into crops, seafood, and meat is essential to protecting human and environmental health. Regulatory efforts at the regional, national and global levels are needed to enhance food safety.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper