0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Reining in plasticulture from land to sea: Pacific Northwest (USA) perspectives on agriculture and aquaculture

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the history and environmental consequences of plasticulture—the use of plastics in agriculture and aquaculture—in the Pacific Northwest, documenting how plastic mulch films, nets, and equipment release microplastics and chemical additives into soil, water, and food. It discusses policy gaps and advocates for reduced plastic use across food production sectors.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic use in food production—known as plasticulture—has transformed agriculture and aquaculture globally. Plasticulture gained momentum in the mid-20th century with the development of novel plastic materials, and by 2009, U.S. farmers used over 200 million pounds of plastic films annually. Though plastics have increased yields and efficiency, they now pose environmental hazards through the release of microplastics (MPs) and chemicals. Despite extensive documentation of MPs in the environment, their role in U.S. food production and impacts on crop, livestock, and aquaculture health remain underexplored. In regions like the Pacific Northwest (PNW), with robust agricultural and aquaculture sectors, plastics from films, mulches, cages, and ropes are significant sources of MPs. Soil amendments like biosolids and compost also contribute MPs from household waste. Agricultural plastics accounted for 3–5% (10–18 million tons) of global plastic production in 2018 and are projected to increase due to growing food demand. Aquaculture uses an estimated 2.1 million tons of plastics annually, but detailed data on MP generation is lacking. Despite known environmental concerns, a sustainable circular model for plastics in food systems is still absent, but necessary. While biodegradable products for use in farming and aquaculture have been introduced, high costs, regulations, and practical limitations hinder widespread adoption. Until recently, the American Society for Plasticulture (ASP) primarily focused on new plastic innovations rather than sustainability. Now, growing awareness of plastic pollution and health risks has led to increased scrutiny. In the PNW—home to key specialty crops and 6% of U.S. aquaculture operations—there is an urgent need for coordinated efforts to reduce plastic contamination. Shifting toward sustainable practices is challenging but critical to protect ecosystems, food safety, and public health, and possible through regional and state-level regulations on composting, wastewater and biosolids mitigation, and movement to more sustainable replacements where feasible. As our knowledge of micro and nanoplastic impacts on the food supply at sea and on land increases, approaches to reduce the use of plastics overall and to limit leaching and fragmentation into crops, seafood, and meat is essential to protecting human and environmental health. Regulatory efforts at the regional, national and global levels are needed to enhance food safety.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastic Use in Agriculture: Balancing Benefits, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Solutions

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the benefits and environmental risks of plasticulture, covering how plastic mulches, greenhouse covers, and irrigation systems boost yields while generating microplastic soil contamination, and proposing sustainable alternatives and policy frameworks.

Article Tier 2

Plastic Pollution in Agriculture as a Threat to Food Security, the Ecosystem, and the Environment: An Overview

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines how plastic products used in agriculture -- from mulch films to greenhouse covers -- contribute to microplastic pollution in soil, water, and crops. While plastics help boost crop production and food quality, their breakdown releases microplastics that can be taken up by plants and enter the food chain. The paper discusses strategies to reduce plastic pollution in farming, which is important because agricultural microplastics represent a direct pathway to human dietary exposure.

Article Tier 2

Environmental health implications of plastic use in agriculture

AI summary Read the abstract

This review discusses the environmental health implications of plastic use in agriculture, including soil microplastic accumulation from mulch films, microplastic uptake by crops, and potential entry into the food chain. The authors recommend shifting toward biodegradable alternatives and tightening regulations on agricultural plastic disposal.

Article Tier 2

Advances in the Sustainable Use of Plastics in Horticulture—Perspectives, Innovations, Opportunities, and Limitations

AI summary Read the abstract

This review assesses the sustainability of plastic use in horticulture — including mulch films, crop covers, and polytunnels — and evaluates options to reduce, reuse, recycle, or replace them. It matters for microplastics because agricultural plastics left in fields fragment into microplastics that contaminate soil and crops, and the review identifies where biodegradable or alternative materials offer the most practical substitution.

Article Tier 2

Sustainable Plasticulture in Chinese Agriculture: a Review of Challenges and Routes to Achieving Long-term Food and Ecosecurity

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the challenges of plasticulture in Chinese agriculture, where macro-, micro-, and nanoplastic pollution from mulch films threatens long-term soil health and crop production. The authors propose holistic solutions targeting plastic production, use, and waste management to protect food security.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper