We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Environmental Impacts by Fragments Released from Nanoenabled Products: A Multiassay, Multimaterial Exploration by the SUN Approach
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested whether fragments released from nano-enabled products — materials containing engineered nanoparticles — caused environmental harm, finding that fragment effects were generally lower than those of the embedded nanomaterials alone. The results are relevant to assessing whether degradation of nanomaterial-containing consumer products generates hazardous micro- and nanoscale debris.
Nanoenabled products (NEPs) have numerous outdoor uses in construction, transportation or consumer scenarios, and there is evidence that their fragments are released in the environment at low rates. We hypothesized that the lower surface availability of NEPs fragment reduced their environmental effects with respect to pristine nanomaterials. This hypothesis was explored by testing fragments generated by intentional micronisation ("the SUN approach"; Nowack et al. Meeting the Needs for Released Nanomaterials Required for Further Testing: The SUN Approach. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016 (50), 2747). The NEPs were composed of four matrices (epoxy, polyolefin, polyoxymethylene, and cement) with up to 5% content of three nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes, iron oxide, and organic pigment). Regardless of the type of nanomaterial or matrix used, it was observed that nanomaterials were only partially exposed at the NEP fragment surface, indicating that mostly the intrinsic and extrinsic properties of the matrix drove the NEP fragment toxicity. Ecotoxicity in multiple assays was done covering relevant media from terrestrial to aquatic, including sewage treatment plant (biological activity), soil worms (Enchytraeus crypticus), and fish (zebrafish embryo and larvae and trout cell lines). We designed the studies to explore the possible modulation of ecotoxicity by nanomaterial additives in plastics/polymer/cement, finding none. The results support NEPs grouping by the matrix material regarding ecotoxicological effect during the use phase. Furthermore, control results on nanomaterial-free polymer fragments representing microplastic had no significant adverse effects up to the highest concentration tested.
More Papers Like This
Everything falls apart: How solids degrade and release nanomaterials, composite fragments, and microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how solid materials -- including plastics, coatings, and composites -- break down and release tiny particles throughout their lifecycle, from manufacturing to disposal. The type and amount of particles released depend on the material's composition and the stresses it faces, such as mechanical wear, sunlight, and heat. Understanding these release mechanisms is crucial because they determine how much microplastic and nanoplastic pollution enters the environment and ultimately reaches humans.
Behavior and Bio-Interactions of Anthropogenic Particles in Marine Environment for a More Realistic Ecological Risk Assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how anthropogenic nanoparticles — including plastic fragments and engineered nanomaterials — behave in marine environments and interact with biology, arguing for more realistic multi-stressor exposure conditions in ecological risk assessment.
Nanoparticles in the Environment and Nanotoxicology
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental fate and toxicological risks of nanomaterials, including engineered nanoparticles and microplastics/nanoplastics, as these materials are increasingly released into ecosystems. The paper surveys current understanding of nanotoxicology and highlights the potential risks that nanoparticle contamination poses to both ecological and human health.
Analysis of ultraviolet and thermal degradations of four common microplastics and evidence of nanoparticle release
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied how UV light and elevated temperature break down four common plastics and found that weathering releases nanoscale plastic particles. Polystyrene and polypropylene were particularly susceptible to UV degradation, generating significant numbers of nanoparticles. The findings confirm that environmental conditions actively fragment microplastics into even smaller, potentially more harmful nanoplastics.
Environmental Degradation and Fragmentation of Microplastics: Dependence on Polymer Type, Humidity, UV Dose and Temperature
AI summary Read the abstract
A systematic study of UV dose, humidity, and temperature effects on six polymer types found that photo-oxidation is the primary driver of microplastic fragmentation and release of secondary nano-sized particles, with the relationship between weathering conditions and fragmentation rates varying by polymer type.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.