We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Virgin microplastics are not causing imminent harm to fish after dietary exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed adult fish to environmentally relevant concentrations of virgin microplastics through their diet over an extended period and found no significant adverse effects on growth, condition, or organ health. The study suggests that clean, unweathered microplastics at realistic concentrations may not cause immediate harm to adult fish, though the authors note that weathered or chemically contaminated particles could produce different outcomes.
Among aquatic organisms, fish are particularly susceptible to ingesting microplastic particles due to their attractive coloration, buoyancy, and resemblance to food. However, in previous experimental setups, fish were usually exposed to unrealistically high concentrations of microplastics, or the microplastics were deliberately contaminated with persistent organic chemicals; also, in many experiments, the fish were exposed only during the larval stages. The present study investigated the effects of virgin microplastics in gilt-head seabream (Sparus aurata) after 45 days' exposure at 0.1 g kg bodyweight day to 6 common types of microplastics. The overall growth, biochemical analyses of the blood, histopathology, and the potential of the microplastics to accumulate in gastrointestinal organs or translocate to the liver and muscles were monitored and recorded. The results revealed that ingestion of virgin microplastics does not cause imminent harm to the adult gilt-head seabream during 45 days of exposure and an additional 30 days of depuration. The retention of virgin microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract was fairly low, indicating effective elimination of microplastics from the body of the fish and no significant accumulation after successive meals. Therefore, both the short- and the long-term retention potential of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of fish is close to zero. However, some large particles remained trapped in the liver, and 5.3% of all the livers analyzed contained at least one microplastic particle. In conclusion, the dietary exposure of S. aurata to 6 common types of virgin microplastics did not induce stress, alter the growth rate, cause pathology, or cause the microplastics to accumulate in the gastrointestinal tract of the fish.
More Papers Like This
Decreased growth and survival in small juvenile fish, after chronic exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed juvenile glassfish to environmentally realistic concentrations of both virgin and harbor-collected microplastics for 95 days, finding that fish in plastic-fed groups grew significantly less in length, depth, and mass, and had lower survival probability than controls.
Microplastics do not affect the feeding rates of a marine predator
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed a marine predatory fish to microplastics at environmentally realistic concentrations and measured feeding rate, finding no significant effect on prey capture behavior, suggesting that concerns about microplastics disrupting predator feeding may not apply at current environmental concentrations.
No adverse effects of three size classes of UV-aged and fragmented polyethylene microplastics on life-history traits of two marine teleost fish species in standardized toxicity tests
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists exposed young fish (red seabream and mummichog) to realistic levels of sun-weathered plastic particles, the kind that break down from everyday plastic waste in the ocean, to see if it harmed their growth or survival. Even at doses up to 30 times higher than what's currently found in the ocean, the fish showed no negative effects. This is reassuring news for seafood lovers, though scientists note more research is still needed on other plastic types and long-term exposure before we fully understand microplastics' impact on marine life and the food we eat.
No effects of plasticized microplastics on the body condition and reproduction of a marine fish
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found no significant effects of plasticized microplastics on body condition or reproductive success in a terrestrial animal model, suggesting that plasticizers associated with microplastics may not impair these endpoints at tested concentrations. The findings contribute to understanding the ecological risk of microplastic-associated chemical additives.
Microplastics exposures of fish: internalization and effects on behavior and growth
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined how microplastics affect fish behavior and growth, finding that fish can ingest them but particles pass through the gut relatively quickly with limited effects at tested concentrations. The research highlights challenges in detecting microplastics in aquatic organisms and suggests risk depends heavily on exposure level and particle type.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.