0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins

2018
Abigail Barrows, Sara E. Cathey, Christopher W. Petersen

Summary

Global patterns of microfiber contamination in the marine environment were reviewed, documenting that synthetic and non-synthetic fibers are found in all major ocean basins, with fibers being the most common microplastic type along shorelines. The review highlights that non-synthetic and semi-synthetic fibers are frequently overlooked in monitoring despite being a significant component of total microfiber pollution.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic and microfiber pollution has been documented in all major ocean basins. Microfibers areone of the most common microparticle pollutants along shorelines. Over 9 million tons of fibers areproduced annually; 60% are synthetic and ~25% are non-synthetic. Non-synthetic and semi-syntheticmicrofibers are infrequently documented and not typically included in marine environment impactanalyses, resulting in underestimation of a potentially pervasive and harmful pollutant. We present themost extensive worldwide microparticle distribution dataset using 1-liter grab samples (n ¼ 1393). Ourcitizen scientist driven study shows a global microparticle average of 11.8 ± 24.0 particles L?1(mean ± SD), approximately three orders of magnitude higher than global model predictions. Open oceansamples showed consistently higher densities than coastal samples, with the highest concentrationsfound in the polar oceans (n ¼ 51), confirming previous empirical and theoretical studies. Particles werepredominantly microfibers (91%) and 0.1e1.5mm in length (77%), a smaller size than those captured inthe majority of surface studies. Using mFT-IR we determined the material types of 113 pieces; 57% wereclassified as synthetic, 12% as semi-synthetic, and 31% as non-synthetic. Samples were taken globally,including from coastal environments and understudied ocean regions. Some of these sites are emergingas areas of concentrated floating plastic and anthropogenic debris, influenced by distant wastemismanagement and/or deposition of airborne particles. Incorporation of smaller-sized microfibers inoceanographic models, which has been lacking, will help us to better understand the movement andtransformation of synthetic, semi-synthetic and non-synthetic microparticles in regional seas and oceanbasins.

Share this paper