We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins
AI summary Read the abstract
Global patterns of microfiber contamination in the marine environment were reviewed, documenting that synthetic and non-synthetic fibers are found in all major ocean basins, with fibers being the most common microplastic type along shorelines. The review highlights that non-synthetic and semi-synthetic fibers are frequently overlooked in monitoring despite being a significant component of total microfiber pollution.
Microplastic and microfiber pollution has been documented in all major ocean basins. Microfibers areone of the most common microparticle pollutants along shorelines. Over 9 million tons of fibers areproduced annually; 60% are synthetic and ~25% are non-synthetic. Non-synthetic and semi-syntheticmicrofibers are infrequently documented and not typically included in marine environment impactanalyses, resulting in underestimation of a potentially pervasive and harmful pollutant. We present themost extensive worldwide microparticle distribution dataset using 1-liter grab samples (n ¼ 1393). Ourcitizen scientist driven study shows a global microparticle average of 11.8 ± 24.0 particles L?1(mean ± SD), approximately three orders of magnitude higher than global model predictions. Open oceansamples showed consistently higher densities than coastal samples, with the highest concentrationsfound in the polar oceans (n ¼ 51), confirming previous empirical and theoretical studies. Particles werepredominantly microfibers (91%) and 0.1e1.5mm in length (77%), a smaller size than those captured inthe majority of surface studies. Using mFT-IR we determined the material types of 113 pieces; 57% wereclassified as synthetic, 12% as semi-synthetic, and 31% as non-synthetic. Samples were taken globally,including from coastal environments and understudied ocean regions. Some of these sites are emergingas areas of concentrated floating plastic and anthropogenic debris, influenced by distant wastemismanagement and/or deposition of airborne particles. Incorporation of smaller-sized microfibers inoceanographic models, which has been lacking, will help us to better understand the movement andtransformation of synthetic, semi-synthetic and non-synthetic microparticles in regional seas and oceanbasins.
More Papers Like This
Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines microfiber contamination in marine environments globally, noting that both synthetic and non-synthetic fibers are common pollutants but that non-synthetic fibers are routinely undercounted in studies. The authors argue that focusing only on synthetic microplastics understates the true scale of microparticle pollution entering the ocean.
Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: A global characterization
AI summary Read the abstract
A global analysis of 916 seawater samples from six ocean basins characterized microfibers as ubiquitous contaminants, finding that many are not synthetic textiles but natural or semi-synthetic materials, questioning the assumption that all environmental fibers are microplastic.
Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers collected 1,393 one-liter water grab samples globally and found a mean microparticle concentration of 11.8 particles per liter — roughly 1,000 times higher than model predictions — with 91% being microfibers, 57% synthetic, and highest densities in polar oceans, while also documenting underreported non-synthetic and semi-synthetic fibers from natural textile sources.
Synthetic microfibers in the marine environment: A review on their occurrence in seawater and sediments.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review synthesized available data on synthetic microfiber concentrations in marine seawater and sediments, finding fibers in all reviewed studies and noting that blue fibers and polypropylene are the most common types. The review highlights the lack of standardized sampling and reporting methods, making cross-study comparisons difficult.
Research progress on occurrence characteristics and source analysis of microfibers in the marine environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review systematically examined the sources of synthetic microfiber pollution in marine environments, covering laundry, fishing gear, industrial textile discharge, and other origins. The authors note that the key sources of marine microfibers remain contested and call for improved source attribution methods.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.