0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

A straightforward method for measuring the range of apparent density of microplastics

The Science of The Total Environment 2018 87 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a simple density gradient method using ethanol, ultrapure water, saturated NaI, and ZnCl2 solutions to measure the apparent density range of microplastics, covering densities from 0.8 to 1.8 g/cm3. NaI-based gradients proved more reliable than ZnCl2, which exhibited higher surface tension and measurement uncertainty.

Density of microplastics has been regarded as the primary property that affect the distribution and bioavailability of microplastics in the water column. For measuring the density of microplastis, we developed a simple and rapid method based on density gradient solutions. In this study, we tested four solvents to make the density gradient solutions, i.e., ethanol (0.8 g/cm), ultrapure water (1.0 g/cm), saturated NaI (1.8 g/cm) and ZnCl (1.8 g/cm). Density of microplastics was measured via observing the float or sink status in the density gradient solutions. We found that density gradient solutions made from ZnCl had a larger uncertainty in measuring density than that from NaI, most likely due to a higher surface tension of ZnCl solution. Solutions made from ethanol, ultrapure water, and NaI showed consistent density results with listed densities of commercial products, indicating that these density gradient solutions were suitable for measuring microplastics with a density range of 0.8-1.8 g/cm.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Gradient columns to measure the density of microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Density gradient columns — an industrial tool rarely applied to environmental studies — were used to precisely measure the density of 150 beach plastic particles and 100 laboratory microplastics, producing what the authors believe is the largest such dataset in the scientific literature. A surprisingly wide density range was found even within the same polymer type (e.g., polyethylene from 823 to 1143 kg/m³), largely driven by dyes and additives added during manufacturing rather than environmental weathering. Accurate density data are critical for modeling whether microplastics float, sink, or remain suspended in water bodies.

Article Tier 2

An Environmentally Friendly Method for the Identification of Microplastics Using Density Analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

This study developed an inexpensive, eco-friendly method for identifying microplastic polymer types using only safe liquids (water, ethanol, and salt solutions) for density-based separation. The approach is field-portable and avoids the hazardous chemicals used in current methods, making microplastic monitoring more accessible.

Article Tier 2

Not all microplastics are created equal. Quantifying efficacy bias and validation of density separation methods

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated and validated density separation methods for extracting microplastics from environmental matrices, quantifying efficacy bias across different polymer types with varying densities. They found that recovery rates differ substantially depending on polymer density relative to the separation solution, introducing systematic bias in microplastic concentration estimates across studies.

Article Tier 2

Measuring the density of environmental microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined the challenges of accurately measuring the density of microplastic particles found in the environment, a key property that determines whether they sink or float. The researchers reviewed how manufacturing processes and environmental weathering change the density of plastics from their original values. Accurately reporting microplastic density is essential for understanding how and why particles accumulate in different parts of aquatic and terrestrial environments.

Article Tier 2

Selection of Suitable Methods for the Detection of Microplastics in the Environment

AI summary Read the abstract

This review evaluated and compared methods for sampling and detecting microplastics across different environmental matrices, recommending density separation with high-density solutions like ZnBr2 for best recovery rates and highlighting the importance of selecting methods matched to the specific research context and environment.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper