0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Freshwater plastic pollution: Recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps

Water Research 2018 619 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a bibliometric review of freshwater plastic pollution research and identified major gaps: data from the most polluted Asian rivers is severely underrepresented, submerged macroplastics are almost entirely unstudied, and studies of plastic impacts on freshwater fauna lag far behind comparable marine research — limiting the ability to accurately estimate river-to-ocean plastic flux.

Study Type Environmental

The overwhelming majority of research conducted to date on plastic pollution (all size fractions) has focused on marine ecosystems. In comparison, only a few studies provide evidence for the presence of plastic debris in freshwater environments. However, owing to the numerous differences between freshwater studies (including studied species and habitats, geographical locations, social and economic contexts, the type of data obtained and also the broad range of purposes), they show only fragments of the overall picture of freshwater plastic pollution. This highlights the lack of a holistic vision and evidences several knowledge gaps and data biases. Through a bibliometric analysis we identified such knowledge gaps, inconsistencies and survey trends of plastic pollution research within freshwater ecosystems. We conclude that there is a continued need to increase the field-data bases about plastics (all size fractions) in freshwater environments. This is particularly important to estimate river plastic emissions to the world's oceans. Accordingly, data about macroplastics from most polluted and larger rivers are very scarce, although macroplastics represent a huge input in terms of plastics weight. In addition, submerged macroplastics may play an important role in transporting mismanaged plastic waste, however almost no studies exist. Although many of the most plastic polluted rivers are in Asia, only 14% of the reviewed studies were carried out in this continent (even though the major inland fisheries of the world are located in Asia's rivers). The potential damage caused by macroplastics on a wide range of freshwater fauna is as yet undetermined, even though negative impacts have been well documented in similar marine species. We also noted a clear supremacy of microplastic studies over macroplastic ones, even though there is no reason to assume that freshwater ecosystems remain unaffected by macro-debris. Finally, we recommend focusing monitoring efforts in most polluted rivers worldwide, but particularly in countries with rapid economic development and poor waste management.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Riverine Plastic Pollution in Asia: Results from a Bibliometric Assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

A bibliometric analysis of river plastic pollution research in Asia identified China, India, and Indonesia as the most active research nations, with the Yangtze, Mekong, and Ganges rivers receiving the most study. The analysis found growing research attention on microplastics and on river-to-ocean plastic transport pathways.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Freshwater Environments – With Special Focus on the Indian Scenario

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines microplastic pollution in freshwater environments globally with a focus on the Indian context, finding that despite India being one of the world's largest contributors to marine plastic pollution, freshwater microplastic research in India remains almost entirely absent, and calling for systematic river catchment monitoring to quantify land-to-ocean plastic fluxes.

Article Tier 2

Freshwater microplastics pollution: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends based on Citespace II

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used bibliometric analysis software to systematically map the emerging field of freshwater microplastic research. The study found a significant gap between freshwater and marine microplastic research, with most freshwater studies conducted in developed countries despite developing nations facing the most severe plastic pollution. The authors note that while rivers and lakes have received some attention, other freshwater sources like groundwater and reservoirs remain largely unstudied.

Review Tier 2

Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs

AI summary Read the abstract

This review synthesizes the growing body of research on microplastic contamination in freshwater rivers, lakes, and sediments, which has received far less attention than marine environments. Researchers found that freshwater microplastic concentrations can rival or exceed those reported in ocean studies, particularly near urban and industrial areas. The study identifies critical knowledge gaps including the lack of standardized sampling methods and limited understanding of how microplastics affect freshwater organisms and ecosystems.

Review Tier 2

Global Trends in Research on Microplastic Contamination and River Water Quality: A Bibliometric Review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microplastic contamination and river water quality, mapping publication growth, geographic distribution of research, and key research themes from the scientific literature. The analysis reveals rapid growth in research volume with a geographic concentration in China and Europe.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper