0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?

The Science of The Total Environment 2018 1264 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Luís Carlos de Sá, Luís Carlos de Sá, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Francisca Ribeiro, Miguel Oliveira Francisca Ribeiro, Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Francisca Ribeiro, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Martyn N. Futter, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Martyn N. Futter, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Martyn N. Futter, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Francisca Ribeiro, Miguel Oliveira Francisca Ribeiro, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn N. Futter, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Martyn N. Futter, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Francisca Ribeiro, Miguel Oliveira

Summary

This review critically evaluates published research on microplastic effects on aquatic organisms and identifies significant gaps between laboratory experiments and real-world conditions. Researchers found that most studies use polystyrene spheres at concentrations far higher than those found in the environment, while the most common microplastics in nature are fragments and fibers of other polymer types. The study calls for more environmentally realistic experimental designs to better understand the actual ecological risks of microplastic pollution.

Polymers

The effects of microplastics (MP) on aquatic organisms are currently the subject of intense research. Here, we provide a critical perspective on published studies of MP ingestion by aquatic biota. We summarize the available research on MP presence, behaviour and effects on aquatic organisms monitored in the field and on laboratory studies of the ecotoxicological consequences of MP ingestion. We consider MP polymer type, shape, size as well as group of organisms studied and type of effect reported. Specifically, we evaluate whether or not the available laboratory studies of MP are representative of the types of MPs found in the environment and whether or not they have reported on relevant groups or organisms. Analysis of the available data revealed that 1) despite their widespread detection in field-based studies, polypropylene, polyester and polyamide particles were under-represented in laboratory studies; 2) fibres and fragments (800-1600 μm) are the most common form of MPs reported in animals collected from the field; 3) to date, most studies have been conducted on fish; knowledge is needed about the effects of MPs on other groups of organisms, especially invertebrates. Furthermore, there are significant mismatches between the types of MP most commonly found in the environment or reported in field studies and those used in laboratory experiments. Finally, there is an overarching need to understand the mechanism of action and ecotoxicological effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of MPs on aquatic organism health.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper