0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Scleractinian coral microplastic ingestion: Potential calcification effects, size limits, and retention

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018 153 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Cheryl Hankins, Allyn Duffy, Kathryn Drisco

Summary

Two Caribbean coral species (Montastraea cavernosa and Orbicella faveolata) were tested for microplastic and microfiber ingestion, size preferences, and retention times, finding active ingestion of microbeads from 425 μm to 2.8 mm with the majority expelled within 48 hours and no effects on calcification rates at tested concentrations. The study establishes that scleractinian corals can ingest and expel microplastics of a wide size range without acute calcification effects, but raises concern about longer-term chronic exposure.

The impact that microplastics (<5 mm) have on scleractinian coral is largely unknown. This study investigated calcification effects, size limits, and retention times of microbeads and microfibers in two Caribbean species, Montastraea cavernosa and Orbicella faveolata, in a series of three experiments. No calcification effects were seen in the two-day exposure to a microbead concentration of 30 mg L. M. cavernosa and O. faveolata actively ingested microbeads ranging in size from 425 μm-2.8 mm, however, a 212-250 μm size class did not elicit a feeding response. The majority of microbeads were expelled within 48 h of ingestion. There was no difference in ingestion or retention times of 425-500 μm microbeads versus 3-5 mm long microfibers. M. cavernosa and O. faveolata have the ability to recognize and reject indigestible material, yet, there is still a need to study effects of energetics and microplastic contamination as a result of ingestion and egestion.

Share this paper